首页> 外文期刊>Headache >Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among US Adults With Headache or Migraine: Results from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey
【24h】

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among US Adults With Headache or Migraine: Results from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey

机译:互补和替代医学在美国成人使用头痛或偏头痛:2012年国家健康面试调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Given the safety concerns regarding pharmacological agents, and the considerable impact of headache and migraine on the sufferer's quality of life, many people seek other treatment options beyond conventional medication and care to address their symptoms; this includes complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Some CAM interventions have shown promising results in clinical trials of headache and migraine management. Nonetheless, there has been little research exploring the reasons for using CAM, and the types of CAM used, among this population. Objective The study aimed to answer the following questions: (1) Which CAM modalities are used most frequently among migraine/headache sufferers? and (2) What are the self‐reported reasons for CAM use among migraine/headache sufferers? Methods This secondary analysis of data from the 2012 U.S. NHIS (a national cross‐sectional survey) examined the use of CAM among migraine/headache sufferers, including the main reasons related to CAM use. Data were weighted and analyzed using STATA 14.0. Results The sample of 34,525 adults included 6558 (18.7%) headache/migraine sufferers. Of the headache/migraine sufferers, a substantial proportion (37.6%, n?=?2427) used CAM for various conditions; however, CAM use specifically for headache/migraine was much less prevalent (3.3%, n?=?216). Of those who used CAM for headache/migraine, about half used CAM in conjunction with prescription (47.8%, n?=?100) or over‐the‐counter medication (55.1%, n?=?113). As severity of headache/migraine increased so did the likelihood of using CAM (severe migraine odds ratio [OR]?=?2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41, 3.82; both recurring headache/severe migraine OR?=?3.36; 95% CI: 2.08, 5.43; when compared to those with recurring headache only). The most frequently used CAM modality among all headache/migraine sufferers (N?=?6558) was manipulative therapy (22.0%, n?=?1317), herbal supplementation (21.7%, n?=?1389) and mind‐body therapy (17.9%, n?=?1100). The top 3 reasons for using CAM for headache were general wellness (28.7%, n?=?60/209), improving overall health (26.8%, n?=?56/209), and reducing stress (16.7%, n?=?35/209). Conclusions Although CAM is used by many sufferers of headache/migraine, the use of CAM specifically for the treatment of headache/migraine is relatively low in the United States. The study also assesses the key differences of CAM use among headache/migraine sufferers in NHIS 2012 compared with those in NHIS 2007, and identifies shortfalls in the evidence‐base of several CAM modalities used by U.S. adults for headache/migraine. This information may assist health providers and consumers in making informed decisions about the safest and most appropriate approach to managing headache/migraine.
机译:背景技术鉴于药理药物的安全问题,以及头痛和偏头痛对患者患者的生活质量影响,许多人以常规药物治疗和护理寻求其他治疗方案,以解决其症状;这包括互补和替代医学(CAM)。一些凸轮干预表明了有希望的头痛和偏头痛管理的临床试验。尽管如此,几乎没有研究探索使用凸轮的原因,以及这种人群中使用的凸轮类型。目标该研究旨在回答以下问题:(1)哪种凸轮方式最常使用偏头痛/头痛患者? (2)偏头痛/头痛患者的凸轮使用的自我报告的原因是什么?方法对2012年美国NHIS(全国横断面调查)的数据进行了次要分析,研究了摩卡中的凸轮/头痛患者的使用,包括与CAM使用相关的主要原因。使用Stata 14.0加权和分析数据。结果34,525名成人样品包括6558(18.7%)头痛/偏头痛患者。头痛/偏头痛患者,大量比例(37.6%,n?= 2427)使用凸轮,用于各种条件;然而,专门用于头痛/偏头痛的凸轮普遍存存(3.3%,n?= 216)。使用凸轮用于头痛/偏头痛的人,约有一半的凸轮与处方(47.8%,N?=?100)或过度计量药物(55.1%,n?= 113)。由于头痛/偏头痛的严重程度增加了使用凸轮的可能性(严重的偏头痛率比[或] =?2.32; 95%置信区间[CI]:1.41,3.82;既复杂性头痛/严重偏头痛或?=?3.36 ; 95%CI:2.08,5.43;与那些只有患有重复性的人数相比)。所有头痛/偏头痛患者(n?= 6558)中最常用的凸轮模型是操纵疗法(22.0%,n?= 1317),草药补充剂(21.7%,n?= 1389)和思想身体治疗(17.9%,n?=?1100)。使用CAM头痛的前3个原因是一般健康(28.7%,N?= 60/209),改善整体健康状况(26.8%,n?= 56/209),减少压力(16.7%,n? =?35/209)。结论虽然凸轮是使用的许多头痛/偏头痛的患者使用,但是在美国使用专门用于治疗头痛/偏头痛的凸轮相对较低。该研究还评估了与NHIS 2012中的头痛/偏头痛患者的主要差异与NHIS 2007中的那些,并识别美国成人用于头痛/偏头痛的几种CAM模式的证据基础的缺陷。这些信息可以帮助卫生提供者和消费者制定有关最安全和最适当的方法来管理头痛/偏头痛的最安全和最合适的方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Headache》 |2017年第8期|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Family and Community MedicineTexas Tech University Health Sciences CenterLubbock TX;

    Department of Public HealthTexas Tech University Health Sciences CenterLubbock TX USA;

    Department of Rural HealthUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaide Australia;

    Faculty of Social Human and Mathematical SciencesUniversity of SouthamptonSouthampton UK;

    Department of Internal and Integrative MedicineKliniken Essen‐Mitte Faculty of Medicine;

    JC School of Public Health and Primary CareHong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine The Chinese;

    Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM)Faculty of Health;

    Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM)Faculty of Health;

    Department of Family and Community MedicineTexas Tech University Health Sciences CenterLubbock TX;

    Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM)Faculty of Health;

    Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM)Faculty of Health;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 诊断学;
  • 关键词

    complementary and alternative medicine; headache; migraine; National Health Interview Survey;

    机译:互补和替代医学;头痛;偏头痛;国家健康面试调查;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号