【24h】

Dynamic breast MRI: Does lower temporal resolution negatively affect clinical kinetic analysis?

机译:动态乳房MRI:较低的时间分辨率会对临床动力学分析产生负面影响吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in kinetic assessments of lesions at breast MRI performed with higher and lower temporal resolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS. All consecutively evaluated BI-RADS category 4, 5, and 6 lesions imaged with breast MRI and pathologically confirmed from October 2005 to August 2009 were identified. Patients underwent MRI with one of two dynamic contrast-enhanced protocols: one with 90-second (October 2005-June 2006) and another with 180-second (July 2006-August 2009) temporal resolution. Studies were processed with a computer- aided evaluation system with initial and delayed contrast-enhanced time points with the k-space centered 90 and 450 seconds after contrast injection. Initial-phase peak enhancement, delayed-phase predominant curve type, and worst curve type were recorded and compared for benign and malignant lesions across protocols. RESULTS. The analysis set comprised 993 lesions: 145 imaged with the 90-second acquisition (17 benign, 28 ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS], 100 invasive cancer) and 848 imaged with the 180-second acquisition (212 benign, 145 DCIS, 491 invasive cancer). Peak enhancement was significantly higher for both benign lesions (p = 0.01) and invasive cancers (p = 0.0008) with the 180-second protocol. Peak enhancement of DCIS was similar in the two protocols (p = 0.88). Delayed-phase kinetics were similar for the two protocols for both benign and malignant lesions when defined by predominant or worst curve type. CONCLUSION. Although it has lower temporal resolution, a 180-second acquisition may be preferable because it allows higher spatial resolution and captures higher initial-phase peak enhancement without loss of delayed-phase kinetic information.
机译:目的。本研究的目的是比较以较高和较低的时间分辨率进行的乳房MRI病变评估的动力学差异。材料和方法。从2005年10月至2009年8月,所有经过连续评估的BI-RADS类别4、5和6病变均通过乳腺MRI成像并经病理证实。使用两种动态对比度增强方案之一对患者进行MRI:一种具有90秒(2005年10月至2006年6月),另一种具有180秒(2006年7月至2009年8月)的时间分辨率。用计算机辅助评估系统处理研究,该系统具有初始和延迟的对比增强时间点,对比剂注入后90和450秒的k空间居中。记录初始阶段的峰值增强,延迟阶段的主要曲线类型和最差曲线类型,并比较整个方案中的良性和恶性病变。结果。分析集包括993个病变:在90秒的采集中成像145个(17例良性,28例原位导管癌[DCIS],100个浸润性癌)和在180秒的采集成像(848良性212个,145 DCIS,491个侵入性)癌症)。采用180秒方案时,良性病变(p = 0.01)和浸润性癌症(p = 0.0008)的峰值增强明显更高。在两种方案中,DCIS的峰增强相似(p = 0.88)。当根据主要或最坏的曲线类型定义时,对于良性和恶性病变,两种方案的延迟相动力学相似。结论。尽管它具有较低的时间分辨率,但180秒的采集可能更可取,因为它允许更高的空间分辨率并捕获更高的初始相位峰值增强,而不会丢失延迟相位动力学信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号