首页> 外文期刊>Headache >Health care Resource Utilization and Migraine Disability Along the Migraine Continuum Among Patients Treated for Migraine
【24h】

Health care Resource Utilization and Migraine Disability Along the Migraine Continuum Among Patients Treated for Migraine

机译:沿偏头痛治疗的患者沿偏头痛沿偏头痛的保健资源利用和偏头痛残疾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective To examine the disability, health care resource utilization, and direct annual costs among patients with migraine, categorized according to the number of headache days experienced in the past month. Background Migraine exists on a continuum of different attack frequencies and associated levels of disability. People with migraine have increased health care utilization and incur substantially more direct costs than those without the disease. While the broad implications of migraine are evident, there is a need to comprehensively describe the impact of headache frequency on the burden of illness. Design/Methods Data from a cross‐sectional, self‐administered, Internet‐based survey of respondents recruited from the US National Health and Wellness Survey panel were assessed. Adults who had self‐reported migraine diagnosis or migraine symptoms in the past 3 months were grouped by their frequency of headache days in the past month: low‐frequency episodic migraine (LFEM, 4 days), moderate‐frequency episodic migraine (MFEM, 4–9 days), high‐frequency episodic migraine (HFEM, 10–14 days), and chronic migraine (CM, ≥15 days). Headache‐related disability was determined from the Headache Impact Test (HIT‐6) scores, and health care resource utilization was assessed by the number of ER visits, hospitalizations, and visits to health care practitioners (HCPs) in the past 12 months. The estimated annual direct costs were calculated from the number of each type of visit and all‐cause cost data from the 2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Results A total of 1347 patients (LFEM, n?=?813; MFEM, n?=?301; HFEM, n?=?105; CM, n?=?128) were included. Patient groups differed significantly by comorbidity index, education and income level, alcohol consumption, and insurance type. Overall, patients with LFEM had the least disability and lowest health care utilization and direct costs. Patients with CM scored 3.7 points (adjusted mean score [95% confidence interval, CI] 68.2 [67.3, 69.0] points) higher on HIT‐6 compared with those in the LFEM group (64.5 points [64.1, 64.8]), while those with HFEM and MFEM scored 2.4 (66.8 points [65.9, 67.8]) and 2.3 (66.7 points [66.2, 67.3]) points higher, respectively (all, P? ?.001). The CM and MFEM groups reported significantly more HCP visits ([mean?±?standard error] CM: 7.03?±?0.83; MFEM: 5.34?±?0.42; vs LFEM: 3.48?±?0.18; both, P? ?.001) and migraine‐related hospitalizations (CM: 0.06?±?0.03; MFEM: 0.05?±?0.02; vs LFEM: 0.02?±?0.01; both, P? ?.05) than the LFEM group. There were significant differences in the total direct costs between the CM and MFEM groups compared with the LFEM group (CM: $3155?±?$609; MFEM: $2721?±?$342; vs LFEM: $1560?±?$118; both, P? ?.001), with differences largely driven by costs of HCP visits. Conclusions In patients with migraine, as the number of headache days increased, so did the burden of disease (disability, health care utilization, and direct costs). Elucidating the burden associated with EM and CM has implications for guiding treatment decisions and management of patients with migraine.
机译:目的审查偏头痛患者的残疾,医疗资源利用率和直接年度成本,根据过去一个月经历的头痛日数分类。背景技术偏头痛存在于不同的攻击频率和相关水平的持续性上。患有偏头痛的人提高了医疗保健利用率,并且比没有这种疾病的那些产生了更大的直接成本。虽然偏头痛的广泛影响是明显的,但需要全面描述头痛频率对疾病负担的影响。评估了从美国国家卫生和健康调查小组招募的横断面,自我管理,基于互联网的受访者的横断面,自我管理的互联网的数据的设计/方法。过去3个月内自我报告的偏头痛诊断或偏头痛症状的成年人被过去一个月的头痛天频率分组:低频emiSodic偏头痛(LFEM,< 4天),中度频率的eGiSodic偏头痛(MFEM ,4-9天),高频情节偏头痛(HFEM,10-14天)和慢性偏头痛(CM,≥15天)。与头痛影响试验(HIN-6)分数确定了与头痛相关的残疾,并通过迈尔访问,住院,医疗从业人员(HCP)的次数评估了医疗资源利用率。估计的年度直接费用是根据2014年医疗支出小组调查的每种类型的访问和全部原因数据的数量计算的。结果共有1347名患者(LFEM,N?=?813; MFEM,N?= 301; HFEM,n?= 105; cm,n?= 128)。患者群体通过合并症指数,教育和收入水平,酒精消费和保险类型显着不同。总体而言,LFEM的患者具有最低残疾和最低的医疗利用和直接成本。与LFEM组的那些相比,CM的患者得分为3.7分(调整后的平均分数[95%置信区间,CI] 68.2 [67.3,69.0](64.5点[64.1,44.8])。使用HFEM和MFEM得分2.4(66.8分[65.9,67.8])和2.3(66.7点[66.2,67.3])分别更高(全部,p≤00.001)。 CM和MFEM组报告了更多的HCP访问([均值?±?标准误差] cm:7.03?±0.83; MFEM:5.34?±0.42; VS LFEM:3.48?±α0.18;两者,P?& ?.001)和偏头痛相关住院治疗(cm:0.06?±0.03; mfem:0.05?±0.02; vs lfem:0.02?±0.01;均比LFEM组。与LFEM组相比,CM和MFEM组之间的直接成本总额有显着差异(CM:$ 3155?±$ 609; MFEM:$ 2721?±?$ 342; vs lfem:$ 1560?±$ 118;两个,p? & 001),差异在很大程度上受到HCP访问成本的差异。结论患有偏头痛的患者,随着头痛日的数量增加,疾病负担(残疾,医疗保健和直接成本)也是如此。阐明与EM和CM相关的负担对指导偏头痛患者的治疗决策和管理有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号