...
首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and presence of lymph node metastases.
【24h】

Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and presence of lymph node metastases.

机译:子宫内膜癌:表观扩散系数与肿瘤等级,子宫肌层浸润深度和淋巴结转移的相关性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to investigate whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of endometrial cancer differ from those of normal endometrium and myometrium and whether they vary according to histologic tumor grade, the depth of myometrial invasion, or lymph node status. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with histologically proved endometrial cancer and 36 control subjects with normal endometrium were enrolled in this prospective study. T2-weighted, dynamic T1-weighted, and diffusion-weighted images with b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm(2) were obtained of all patients. The ADC values of endometrial cancer, normal endometrium, and normal myometrium were recorded. Tumor grade, the depth of myometrial invasion, and lymph node status were assessed at postoperative histopathologic analysis. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) ADC value (10(-3) mm(2)/s) of endometrial cancer (0.77 +/- 0.12) was significantly lower than that of normal endometrium (1.31 +/- 0.11, p < 0.0001) and normal myometrium (1.52 +/- 0.21, p < 0.0001), with no overlap between the two former distributions. There was no significant difference between ADC values of endometrial cancer tissue in patients with tumor grade 1 (0.79 +/- 0.08, n = 14), grade 2 (0.76 +/- 0.14, n = 40), or grade 3 (0.75 +/- 0.12, n = 16) (p = 0.67); in patients with deep (0.77 +/- 0.13, n = 18) and those with superficial (0.76 +/- 0.12, n = 52) myometrial invasion (p = 0.87); and in patients with (0.78 +/- 0.10, n = 6) and those without (0.75 +/- 0.14, n = 39) lymph node metastases (p = 0.64). CONCLUSION: ADC values allow normal endometrium to be differentiated from endometrial carcinoma; however, they do not correlate with histologic tumor grade, the depth of myometrial invasion, or whether lymph node metastases are present.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是调查子宫内膜癌的表观弥散系数(ADC)值是否不同于正常子宫内膜和子宫肌层,以及它们是否根据组织学肿瘤分级,子宫肌层浸润深度或淋巴结状态而变化。研究对象和方法:这项前瞻性研究纳入了70例经组织学证实为子宫内膜癌的患者和36例子宫内膜正常的对照对象。所有患者均获得b值分别为0和1000 s / mm(2)的T2加权,动态T1加权和扩散加权图像。记录子宫内膜癌,正常子宫内膜和正常子宫内膜的ADC值。在术后组织病理学分析中评估肿瘤等级,肌层浸润深度和淋巴结状态。结果:子宫内膜癌的平均(+/- SD)ADC值(10(-3)mm(2)/ s)(0.77 +/- 0.12)明显低于正常子宫内膜(1.31 +/- 0.11, p <0.0001)和正常子宫肌层(1.52 +/- 0.21,p <0.0001),前两种分布之间没有重叠。肿瘤1级(0.79 +/- 0.08,n = 14),2级(0.76 +/- 0.14,n = 40)或3级(0.75 +)的患者子宫内膜癌组织的ADC值之间无显着差异。 /-0.12,n = 16)(p = 0.67);在深肌层浸润(0.77 +/- 0.13,n = 18)和浅表肌浸润(0.76 +/- 0.12,n = 52)的患者中(p = 0.87);有(0.78 +/- 0.10,n = 6)和没有(0.75 +/- 0.14,n = 39)淋巴结转移的患者(p = 0.64)。结论:ADC值可将正常子宫内膜与子宫内膜癌区分开。但是,它们与组织学肿瘤分级,肌层浸润深度或是否存在淋巴结转移无关。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号