首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Comparative performance of MDCT and MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography in characterizing small pancreatic cysts.
【24h】

Comparative performance of MDCT and MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography in characterizing small pancreatic cysts.

机译:MDCT和MRI与MR胰胆管造影在表征小胰腺囊肿中的比较性能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare MDCT with MRI-MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in characterizing small pancreatic cysts (< or = 3 cm) and predicting aggressiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, contrast-enhanced MDCT and MRI examinations of 30 patients with 38 pathologically confirmed small pancreatic cysts were reviewed. MDCT and MRCP studies were independently evaluated by two readers for cyst morphology, cyst characterization, and prediction of lesion aggressiveness, which included lesions with moderate-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia (carcinoma in situ), and invasive carcinomas. The sensitivity of MDCT and MRI for the detection of each morphologic feature, accuracy for cyst characterization, and predictive values for aggressiveness were calculated. RESULTS: Of 38 lesions, 14 were side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), 12 mixed IPMNs, six mucinous cystic neoplasms, and six nonneoplastic cysts. On histopathology, 26 lesions were nonaggressive (six nonneoplastic cysts, six benign mucinous cystic neoplasms, 14 low-grade dysplasias in IPMNs), whereas 12 lesions revealed aggressive biology (eight moderate-grade dysplasias, four high-grade dysplasias in IPMNs). The sensitivity of MRCP for the detection of morphologic features was better than that of MDCT, but the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.25-1). Interreader agreement and MDCT-MRI agreement for morphologic features were good to perfect (kappa = 0.7-1). The accuracy of MDCT and MRI was higher in classifying cysts as mucinous or nonmucinous than in determining a specific diagnosis (71-84.2% vs 39.5-44.7%, respectively), whereas the accuracy of the two techniques in characterizing cysts into nonaggressive and aggressive categories was similar (MDCT vs MRI, 75-78% vs 78-86%, respectively; p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: MRI enables more confident assessment of the morphology of small cysts than MDCT, but the accuracy of the two imaging techniques for cyst characterization is comparable. MDCT and MRI have high accuracy in classifying cysts into mucinous and nonmucinous categories and perform similarly in estimating histologic aggressiveness.
机译:目的:我们的研究目的是比较MDCT与MRI-MR胰胆管造影(MRCP)在表征小胰腺囊肿(≤3 cm)和预测侵袭性方面的价值。材料与方法:在一项回顾性分析中,对30例经病理证实的小胰腺囊肿的30例患者进行了对比增强的MDCT和MRI检查。两名读者分别对MDCT和MRCP研究的囊肿形态,囊肿特征和病变侵袭性进行了独立评估,其中包括中度不典型增生,高度不典型增生(原位癌)和浸润性癌。计算了MDCT和MRI对每种形态特征的敏感性,囊肿特征的准确性以及侵袭性的预测值。结果:在38个病灶中,有14个是侧支导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN),12个混合的IPMN,6个黏液性囊性肿瘤和6个非肿瘤性囊肿。在组织病理学上,有26个病变是非侵袭性的(6个非肿瘤性囊肿,6个良性粘液性囊性肿瘤,14个IPMNs的低度不典型增生),而12个病变显示了侵袭性生物学(8个中度等级的不典型增生,4个IPMNs的高度不典型增生)。 MRCP对形态特征检测的敏感性优于MDCT,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.25-1)。形态特征的阅读器一致性和MDCT-MRI一致性良好(kappa = 0.7-1)。将囊肿分为粘液性或非粘液性的MDCT和MRI的准确性高于确定特定诊断的准确率(分别为71-84.2%和39.5-44.7%),而将囊肿分为非侵略性和侵袭性类别的两种技术的准确性相似(MDCT vs MRI,分别为75-78%vs 78-86%; p> 0.05)。结论:MRI能够比MDCT更可靠地评估小囊肿的形态,但是两种成像技术对囊肿特征的准确性是可比的。 MDCT和MRI在将囊肿分为粘液性和非粘液性分类中具有很高的准确性,并且在估计组织学侵袭性方面表现相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号