【24h】

Anaphylaxis to iodinated contrast material: nonallergic hypersensitivity or IgE-mediated allergy?

机译:碘化造影剂的过敏反应:非过敏性超敏反应或IgE介导的过敏反应?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Contrast material is generally well tolerated although approximately 1% of patients who receive low-osmolar nonionic contrast material will develop anaphylaxis symptoms. Because most anaphylactic reactions are mild and nonallergic, clinically mimicking immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergy, diagnostic skin testing has been discussed controversially in the past and prophylactic pretreatment drug regimens are recommended instead. In the past 6 years, all patients with contrast material-induced anaphylaxis have been subjected to allergologic diagnostic procedures to clearly differentiate allergic and nonallergic anaphylaxis. Thus the purpose of our study was to identify and differentiate IgE-mediated allergy and nonallergic contrast material-induced hypersensitivity. Furthermore, the objective of our diagnostic procedures was not only to identify the culprit contrast material but also to find alternative contrast material for future radiologic interventions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We evaluated96 patients with anaphylaxis symptoms after contrast material application using standardized intradermal skin testing. In patients with positive skin tests, the IgE-mediated allergy was further evaluated with in vitro and challenge tests. RESULTS: In four patients (suffering from anaphylaxis grades 2 and 3) out of the 96 (4.2%), skin tests and basophil activation tests strongly suggested IgE-mediated allergy to the contrast materials iopromide (two patients), iomeprol, and iopentol. In two patients with allergies to iopromide and iomeprol, alternative nonionic monomer contrast materials were tolerated, as identified in controlled challenge tests with iopamidol and iopromide, respectively. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of patients with contrast material-induced anaphylaxis (at least those with anaphylaxis > or = grade 2) should always include appropriate skin tests ensuring that patients with an IgE-mediated allergy are not missed. Moreover, allergologic testing may identify a contrast material of the group of nonionic monomers that will be tolerated in future radiologic interventions.
机译:目的:造影剂通常耐受性好,尽管接受低渗非离子造影剂的患者中约有1%会出现过敏反应症状。由于大多数过敏反应是轻度和非过敏性的,因此在临床上模仿免疫球蛋白E(IgE)介导的过敏反应,因此在过去对诊断性皮肤测试进行了有争议的讨论,建议使用预防性预处理药物治疗。在过去的6年中,所有具有造影剂诱发过敏反应的患者均接受了变应性诊断程序,以清楚地区分过敏性和非过敏性过敏反应。因此,我们研究的目的是鉴定和区分IgE介导的过敏和非过敏性对比材料引起的超敏反应。此外,我们诊断程序的目标不仅是确定罪魁祸首的对比材料,而且还为将来的放射学干预寻找替代性的对比材料。研究对象和方法:我们使用标准化的皮内皮肤试验评估了96例对比剂应用后的过敏反应症状患者。在皮肤试验阳性的患者中,通过体外和激发试验进一步评估了IgE介导的过敏。结果:在96例(4.2%)的患者中,有4例(遭受2级和3级过敏反应),皮肤试验和嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验强烈建议IgE介导对造影剂iopromide(2例患者),iomeprol和iopentol过敏。在分别对碘普罗米和碘美普尔过敏的两名患者中,可以接受其他非离子单体造影剂的耐受性,这分别在碘帕醇和碘普罗姆的对照激发试验中得以确定。结论:对造影剂诱发过敏反应的患者(至少过敏反应≥2级的患者)的评估应始终包括适当的皮肤检查,以确保不会遗漏具有IgE介导的过敏反应的患者。此外,变态反应测试可能会确定在未来的放射学干预中可以耐受的非离子单体组的对比材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号