...
首页> 外文期刊>Weed Technology: A journal of the Weed Science Society of America >Herbicide-resistant weeds in the Canadian prairies: 2012 to 2017
【24h】

Herbicide-resistant weeds in the Canadian prairies: 2012 to 2017

机译:加拿大大草原的除草剂抗性:2012年至2017年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This report updates the incidence of herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds across western Canada from the last report covering 2007 to 2011. This third round of preharvest surveys was conducted in Saskatchewan in 2014 and 2015, Manitoba in 2016, and Alberta in 2017, totaling 798 randomly selected cropped fields across 28 million ha. In addition, we screened 1,108 weed seed samples submitted by prairie growers or industry between 2012 and 2016. Of 578 fields where wild oat seed was collected, 398 (69%) had an HR biotype: 62% acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor (WSSA Group 1) resistant, 34% acetolactate synthase inhibitor (Group 2) resistant, and 27% Group 1+2 resistant (vs. 41%, 12%, and 8%, respectively, in the previous second-round surveys from 2007 to 2009). The sharp increase in Group 2 resistance is the result of reliance on this site of action to manage Group 1 resistance and the resultant increased selection pressure. There are no POST options to control Group 1+2-HR wild oat in wheat or barley. The rise of Group 2 resistance in green foxtail (11% of sampled fields) and yellow foxtail (17% of Manitoba fields), which was not detected in the previous survey round, parallels the results for wild oat resistance. Various Group 2-HR populations of broadleaf weeds were confirmed, with cleavers and field pennycress being most abundant. Results of submission-sample testing reflected survey results. Although not included in this study, a postharvest survey in Alberta in 2017 indicated widespread Groups 2, 4 (dicamba), and 9 (glyphosate) resistance in kochia and Group 2 resistance in Russian thistle. These surveys bring greater awareness of HR weeds to growers and land managers at local and regional levels, and highlight the urgency to preserve herbicide susceptibility in our key economic weed species.
机译:本报告从2007年至2011年的上一份报告从上一份报告汇总加拿大西部的除草剂抗性(HR)杂草发生率。这一轮第三轮预见调查是在2014年和2015年的萨斯喀彻温省进行的,2016年,亚伯大学在2017年,总计798随机选择跨越2800万公顷的裁剪字段。此外,我们在2012年和2016年之间筛选了由草原种植者或行业提交的1,108种杂草种子样本。收集野外燕麦种子的578个领域,398(69%)具有HR生物型:62%乙酰-CoA羧化酶抑制剂(WSSA组1)抗性,34%乙酸盐合酶抑制剂(第2组)抗性,分别为2007年至2009年之前的第二轮调查中的27%的1 + 2次抗性(与41%,12%和8%) 。第2组电阻的急剧增加是依赖于该组织的依赖性来管理第1组阻力,并且所得到的选择压力增加。在小麦或大麦中控制第1组+ 2-HR野外燕麦的帖子选项。在以前的调查循环中未检测到的绿色粪码(占用掉采样场的11%)和黄色粪(17%的Manitoba领域)的抗性的兴起,这是野生燕麦抗性的结果。确认了各种群体的阔叶杂草种群,裂解器和野外银行最丰富。提交样本测试的结果反映了调查结果。虽然本研究不包括在本研究中,2017年艾伯塔省的采后调查表明了俄罗斯蓟和第2组抗性的艾伯塔省的采购调查显示了2,4(Dicamba)和9(草甘膦)抗性。这些调查提高人力资源杂草对种植者和土地管理人员在当地和区域一级的意识,并突出了在我们的主要经济杂草物种中保持除草剂易感性的紧迫性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号