...
首页> 外文期刊>Western journal of nursing research >Examining Perceptions and Attitudes: A Review of Likert-Type Scales Versus Q-Methodology
【24h】

Examining Perceptions and Attitudes: A Review of Likert-Type Scales Versus Q-Methodology

机译:检查感知和态度:对李克特型尺度的审查与Q方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this article is to compare and discuss the use of Likert-type scales and Q-methodology to examine perceptions and attitudes in nursing research. This article provides a brief review of each approach, and how they have been used to advance our knowledge in health-related perceptions and attitudes. Although Likert-type scales are economical, efficient, and easy to analyze, the results can be difficult to interpret or translate into meaningful practice. In contrast, Q-methodology yields holistic and in-depth information on what the prevailing perceptions and attitudes are, but its conduct is logistically challenging and the results' generalizability can be limited. The appropriate uses of either or both approaches to answer different research questions will be discussed. Nurse scientists are called upon to continue our exploration, utilization, and expansion of unique methodologies that directly speak to a meaningful examination of these important constructs in nursing research.
机译:本文的目的是比较和讨论利用李克特型秤和Q方法的使用,以检查护理研究中的看法和态度。本文介绍了对每种方法的简要审查,以及如何用于推动我们在与健康相关的看法和态度方面的知识。虽然李克特型尺度是经济,高效,易于分析的,但结果难以解释或翻译成有意义的做法。相比之下,Q-方法产生整体和深入的信息,就普遍的感知和态度是什么,但其行为是逻辑上的挑战性,结果普遍性可以限制。将讨论任何回答不同研究问题的方法或两种方法的适当用途。呼吁护士科学家继续我们的勘探,利用和扩展独特的方法,直接与在护理研究中的这些重要构建的有意义的检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号