...
首页> 外文期刊>Weather and forecasting >A Description of the Real-Time HFIP Corrected Consensus Approach (HCCA) for Tropical Cyclone Track and Intensity Guidance
【24h】

A Description of the Real-Time HFIP Corrected Consensus Approach (HCCA) for Tropical Cyclone Track and Intensity Guidance

机译:对热带旋风轨道和强度指导的实时六级校正互联方法(HCCA)的描述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study discusses the development of the Hurricane Forecast Improvement Program (HFIP) Corrected Consensus Approach (HCCA) for tropical cyclone track and intensity forecasts. The HCCA technique relies on the forecasts of separate input models for both track and intensity and assigns unequal weighting coefficients based on a set of training forecasts. The HCCA track and intensity forecasts for 2015 were competitive with some of the best-performing operational guidance at the National Hurricane Center (NHC); HCCA was the most skillful model for Atlantic track forecasts through 48 h. Average track input model coefficients for the 2015 forecasts in both the Atlantic and eastern North Pacific basins were largest for the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) deterministic model and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Forecast System (GFS) ensemble mean, but the relative magnitudes of the intensity coefficients were more varied. Input model sensitivity experiments conducted using retrospective HCCA forecasts from 2011 to 2015 indicate that the ECMWF deterministic model had the largest positive impact on the skill of the HCCA track forecasts in both basins. The most important input models for HCCA intensity forecasts are the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) Model and the Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System-Tropical Cyclone (COAMPS-TC) model initialized from the GFS. Several updates were incorporated into the HCCA formulation prior to the 2016 season. Verification results indicate HCCA continued to be a skillful model, especially for short-range (12-48 h) track forecasts in both basins.
机译:本研究讨论了热带旋风轨道和强度预测的飓风预测改善计划(HFIP)纠正了共识方法(HCCA)的发展。 HCCA技术依赖于轨道和强度的单独输入模型的预测,并根据一组培训预测分配不等的加权系数。 2015年的HCCA赛道和强度预测与国家飓风中心(NHC)的一些最佳业务指导有竞争力; HCCA是大西洋赛道预测的最熟练的模型,通过48小时。 2015年大西洋和东部地区盆地2015年预测的平均轨道输入模型系数最大为欧洲的中距离(ECMWF)确定性模型和国家环境预测中心(NCEP)全球预测系统(GFS) )合奏意味着,但强度系数的相对幅度更加多样化。从2011年到2015年使用回顾性HCCA预测进行的输入模型敏感实验表明ECMWF确定性模型对两个盆地的HCCA跟踪预测技术的积极影响最大。 HCCA强度预测最重要的输入模型是飓风天气研究和预测(HWRF)模型以及耦合的海洋气氛Mescle预测系统 - 热带旋风(副旋载-TC)模型从GFS初始化。在2016赛季之前,几次更新被纳入了HCCA制剂。验证结果表明,HCCA继续成为熟练的模型,特别是对于两个盆地的短程(12-48小时)轨道预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号