...
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of pharmacy practice >Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department
【24h】

Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department

机译:在急诊部门在急诊部门获得的药剂师驱动的肺炎的药剂师驱动的协议改变之后的规定趋势和重新审议率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Objective To compare pharmacist‐led prescribing changes and associated 30‐day revisit rates across different regimens for patients discharged from an emergency department ( ED ) with a diagnosis of community‐acquired pneumonia ( CAP ). Methods An observational, retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of patients who were discharged from an ED over a 4‐year period with a diagnosis of CAP . Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, antibiotic selection and comorbidity and condition severity scores were collected for two cohorts: 2012–13 (before protocol change) and 2014–15 (post‐protocol change). During January 2014, a pharmacist‐led protocol change with prescriber education was implemented to better align ED treatment practices with clinical practice guidelines. The primary endpoint was the change in prescribing practices across the two cohorts. Key findings A total of 741 patients with CAP were identified, including 411 (55.5%) patients in 2012–13 and 330 (44.5%) in 2014–15. Prescribing of macrolide monotherapy regimens decreased significantly following protocol change (70.1% versus 42.7%; difference: 27.4%, 95% CI : 23.8–31.0%) with a reciprocal increase in macrolide/β‐lactam combination prescribing (6.3–21.8%; difference: 15.5%, 95% CI : 12.9–18.1%). A total of 12.2% of patients who received macrolide/β‐lactam combination treatment revisited a network ED within 30 days due to worsening pneumonia, compared to 8.6% of patients who received macrolide monotherapy treatment ( P = NS ). Conclusions The current study showed a significant increase in antibiotic prescribing compliance following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change and education, but no statistical difference in rates of return for macrolide monotherapy versus other regimens.
机译:摘要目的比较药剂师LED在急诊部(ED)排放的患者的不同方案中的改变和相关的30天重新审视率,并诊断为社区获得的肺炎(CAP)。方法采用观察结果,回顾性队列队列分析对4年内的患者进行了从eD的患者进行了诊断。患者人口统计学,临床特征,抗生素选择和合并症和病症严重分数为两个队列:2012-13(协议变更前)和2014-15(协议后变更)。 2014年1月期间,实施了具有处方教育的药剂师LED协议改变,以便在临床实践指导方面更好地对准ED处理实践。主要终点是两个队列中规定实践的变化。重点发现,鉴定了741例盖帽患者,2012-13和2014-15款(45.5%)患者在2012年至15日(44.5%)。在议定书变化下显着降低了大环内酯单疗法的方案(70.1%与42.7%;差异:27.4%,95%CI:23.8-31.0%),具有互殖元/β-内酰胺组合规定(6.3-21.8%;差异:15.5%,95%CI:12.9-18.1%)。 12.2%的接受高氯化物/β-内酰胺组合治疗的患者在30天内重新审视了肺炎的30天内的网络ED,而肺炎的8.6%是接受大环内德单疗法治疗的患者(P = NS)。结论目前的研究表明,在药剂师驱动的协议变化和教育后,抗生素规定符合性显着增加,但大环内德单疗法与其他方案的回报率没有统计学差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号