...
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants >Implant Drill Characteristics: Thermal and Mechanical Effects of Two-, Three-, and Four-Fluted Drills
【24h】

Implant Drill Characteristics: Thermal and Mechanical Effects of Two-, Three-, and Four-Fluted Drills

机译:植入式钻头特性:双槽,三槽和四槽钻的热和机械效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: Avoiding excessive trauma-thermal or otherwise-during dental implant site preparation is considered critical to implant success; overheating is considered to be a major cause of bone necrosis. Studies evaluating thermal and mechanical effects of implant drill design are limited, and effects of flute design have not been accounted for. The purpose of this study was to compare heat generation and cutting efficiency associated with two-, three-, and four-fluted implant drills to investigate the optimal number of flutes. Materials and Methods: Two-, three-, and four-fluted dental implant drills with identical point, relief, and rake angles and otherwise standard dimensions were evaluated. Real-time temperature changes while drilling artificial bone were recorded using an infrared thermal imager. Cutting efficiency was assessed as the drilling time to a 15-mm depth under constant load using a specially designed recording system. Each drill variation was examined 20 times. A one-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. Results: Mean temperature increases amounted to 8.3 degrees C, 10.8 degrees C, and 15.1 degrees C for two-, three-, and four-fluted drills, respectively; temperatures significantly increased (P < .001) with an increased number of flutes. Mean drilling time serving as a measure of cutting efficiency amounted to 2.6, 2.5, and 2.5 seconds for the two-, three-, and four-fluted drills, respectively. A trend of cutting efficiency increasing or decreasing according to the number of flutes was not observed. Differences in cutting efficiency among the three drill variations were statistically significant (P = .015). The cutting efficiency of the three-fluted drill was superior to that of the two-fluted drill (P = .016). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, a two-fluted drill would be preferred for osteotomy preparation due to its level of heat generation, whereas a three-fluted drill showed favorable cutting efficiency.
机译:目的:避免过量的创伤 - 热或以其他方式在牙科植入物现场制剂被认为是植入成功的关键;过热被认为是骨坏死的主要原因。评估植入式钻钻设计的热和机械效果的研究有限,并且尚未计算长笛设计的影响。本研究的目的是比较与两种,三槽和四槽植入钻头相关的发热和切割效率,以研究最佳的长笛数。材料和方法:评估了具有相同点,浮雕和耙角的两种,三槽和四槽牙植入钻头,以及其他标准尺寸。使用红外线热成像仪记录钻井人造骨的实时温度变化。使用专门设计的记录系统,在恒定负载下评估切割效率至15毫米深度。检查每个钻头变化20次。方差单向分析用于统计分析。结果:对于两种,三槽和四槽钻头,平均温度升高量为8.3℃,10.8℃和15.1摄氏度;温度显着增加(p <.001),长笛数增加。平均钻孔时间作为切割效率的量度,分别为2.6,2.5和2.5秒,对于两种,三槽和四槽钻头。未观察到根据长笛的数量增加或减少的切割效率的趋势。三个钻液中的切削效率的差异在统计学上显着(p = .015)。三槽钻的切削效率优于双凹槽钻头(P = .016)。结论:在研究的局限内,由于其发热水平,两种凹槽训练对于截错的仪表是骨质切除术准备,而三槽钻头显示出有利的切削效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号