...
首页> 外文期刊>Vision Research: An International Journal in Visual Science >Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency
【24h】

Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency

机译:随机点立体图中双目视角定义的正弦波波纹的阈值:各个差异的因子分析显示出用于空间频率的两个立体机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Graphical abstract Display Omitted Highlights ? Disparity threshold data for sinusoidal corrugations contained two factors. ? Factors loaded onto low ( ? Each factor had nearly identical tuning for horizontal and vertical patterns. ? The factors were correlated, implying separate but interdependent mechanisms. Abstract Threshold functions for sinusoidal depth corrugations typically reach their minimum (highest sensitivity) at spatial frequencies of 0.2–0.4?cycles/degree (cpd), with lower thresholds for horizontal than vertical corrugations at low spatial frequencies. To elucidate spatial frequency and orientation tuning of stereoscopic mechanisms, we measured the disparity sensitivity functions, and used factor analytic techniques to estimate the existence of independent underlying stereo channels. The data set (N?=?30?individuals) was for horizontal and vertical corrugations of spatial frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 1.6?cpd. A principal component analysis of disparity sensitivities (log-arcsec) revealed that two significant factors accounted for 70% of the variability. Following Varimax rotation to approximate “simple structure”, one factor clearly loaded onto low spatial frequencies (≤0.4?cpd), and a second was tuned to higher spatial frequencies (≥0.8?cpd). Each factor had nearly identical tuning (loadings) for horizontal and vertical patterns. The finding of separate factors for low and high spatial frequencies is consistent with previous studies. The failure to find separate factors for horizontal and vertical corrugations is somewhat surprising because the neuronal mechanisms are believed to be different. Following an oblique rotation (Direct Oblimin), the two factors correlated significantly, suggesting some interdependence rather than full independence between the two factors.
机译:图形抽象显示省略了亮点?针对正弦波纹的差异阈值数据包含两个因素。还加载到低的因素(?每个因素对水平和垂直图案几乎相同调整。 -0.4?循环/度(CPD),水平阈值水平低于低空间频率的垂直波纹。为了阐明立体机制的空间频率和方向调整,我们测量了差异灵敏度功能,并使用因子分析技术来估计存在独立的底层立体声通道。数据集(n?=?30?个人)是用于水平和垂直波纹的空间频率,范围为0.1至1.6?CPD。差异敏感性的主要成分分析(Log-Arcsec)显示了两个重要因素占变率的70%。遵循Varimax旋转到近似吃“简单结构”,一个清晰地装在低空间频率(≤0.4?CPD)上的一个因素,并将第二个被调谐到更高的空间频率(≥0.8?CPD)。每个因素具有几乎相同的调谐(负载),用于水平和垂直图案。对低空间频率的单独因素的发现与先前的研究一致。未能找到水平和垂直波纹的单独因素有点令人惊讶,因为神经元机制被认为是不同的。在倾斜旋转(直接左侧义)之后,这两个因素显着相关,表明一些相互依存而不是两种因素之间的完全独立性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号