...
首页> 外文期刊>Vascular >A phantom study for the comparison of different brands of computed tomography scanners and software packages for endovascular aneurysm repair sizing and planning
【24h】

A phantom study for the comparison of different brands of computed tomography scanners and software packages for endovascular aneurysm repair sizing and planning

机译:用于比较不同品牌的计算机断层扫描扫描仪和软件包对血管内动脉瘤修复规模化的幻像研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives Correct sizing of endoprostheses used for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms is important to prevent endoleaks and migration. Sizing requires several steps and each step introduces a possible sizing error. The goal of this study was to investigate the magnitude of these errors compared to the golden standard: a vessel phantom. This study focuses on the errors in sizing with three different brands of computed tomography angiography scanners in combination with three reconstruction software packages. Methods Three phantoms with a different diameter, altitude and azimuth were scanned with three computed tomography scanners: Toshiba Aquilion 64-slice, Philips Brilliance iCT 256-slice and Siemens Somatom Sensation 64-slice. The phantom diameters were determined in the stretched view after central lumen line reconstruction by three observers using Simbionix PROcedure Rehearsal Studio, 3mensio and TeraRecon planning software. The observers, all novices in sizing endoprostheses using planning software, measured 108 slices each. Two senior vascular surgeons set the tolerated error margin of sizing on ±1.0?mm. Results In total, 11.3% of the measurements (73/648) were outside the set margins of ±1.0 mm from the phantom diameter, with significant differences between the scanner types (14.8%, 12.1%, 6.9% for the Siemens scanner, Philips scanner and Toshiba scanner, respectively, p -value?=?0.032), but not between the software packages (8.3%, 11.1%, 14.4%, p -value?=?0.141) or the observers (10.6%, 9.7%, 13.4%, p -value?=?0.448). Conclusions It can be concluded that the errors in sizing were independent of the used software packages, but the phantoms scanned with Siemens scanner were significantly more measured incorrectly than the phantoms scanned with the Toshiba scanner. Consequently, awareness on the type of computed tomography scanner and computed tomography scanner setting is necessary, especially in complex abdominal aortic aneurysms sizing for fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair if appropriate the sizing is of upmost importance.
机译:目的,用于治疗腹主动脉瘤的内瓣的正确尺寸对于预防止回阀和迁移是重要的。尺寸需要几个步骤,每个步骤都引入了可能的尺寸误差。本研究的目标是调查与金色标准相比的这些误差的大小:血管幻影。本研究侧重于三种不同品牌的计算机断层造影血管造影扫描仪的尺寸尺寸的错误,以及三个重建软件包。方法采用三个计算机断层扫描仪扫描三个具有不同直径,高度和方位角的三个幽灵:Toshiba Aquilion 64-Slice,飞利浦Bryliance ICT 256-Slice和Siemens Somatom Sensation 64切片。使用Simbionix程序排练Studio,3Mensio和Terarecon计划软件,在中央腔内重建后,在中央腔线重建后确定幻影直径。观察者,使用规划软件调整内置假置的所有新手,每次测量108个切片。两位高级血管外科医生在±1.0±0. mm上设置尺寸的容忍误差余量。结果总计,11.3%的测量(73/648)在距幻像直径±1.0毫米的设定边距外,扫描仪类型之间有显着差异(Siemens Scanner,Philips的14.8%,12.1%,6.9%)扫描仪和东芝扫描仪,P -Value?=?0.032),但在软件包之间(8.3%,11.1%,14.4%,P-value?= 0.141)或观察者(10.6%,9.7%, 13.4%,p -value?=?0.448)。结论可以得出结论,尺寸的误差独立于所用软件包,但西门子扫描仪扫描的幻影比用东芝扫描仪扫描的幻像扫描得多。因此,需要对计算机断层扫描扫描仪和计算机断层扫描扫描仪设置的意识,特别是在适当的尺寸最重要的情况下,在复杂的腹主动脉瘤修复中的复杂腹主动脉瘤修复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号