...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology >Measurement of Acetabular Component Position in Total Hip Arthroplasty in Dogs: Comparison of a Radio-Opaque Cup Position Assessment Device Using Fluoroscopy with CT Assessment and Direct Measurement
【24h】

Measurement of Acetabular Component Position in Total Hip Arthroplasty in Dogs: Comparison of a Radio-Opaque Cup Position Assessment Device Using Fluoroscopy with CT Assessment and Direct Measurement

机译:狗总髋关节置换术中髋臼组分位置的测量:使用CT评估和直接测量使用荧光透视的无线电不透明杯子位置评估装置的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives?The aim of this study was to compare measurements of angle of lateral opening (ALO) and version determined using a radioopaque cup position assessment device imaged with fluoroscopy to measurements obtained by CT and direct measurement in a cadaveric model. Our null hypothesis was that there would not be any difference in the angles measured by the techniques. Methods?Six cadavers were implanted with BFX acetabular components. The CPAD was placed and images were obtained with fluoroscopy. Measurements were obtained from the radiopaque marker bars on the CPAD device, and version and ALO were calculated. The ALO and version were determined by CT and DM. Comparisons were made using a two-way analysis of variance and a generalized linear model procedure analysis. Results?There were no significant differences between the measurements for ALO (p?=?0.275) or version (p?=?0.226). Correlation between methods was 0.948 and 0.951 for ALO and version, respectively. The mean difference (standard deviation [SD], and 95% confidence interval [CI]) for ALO were: CT versus CPAD 1.85?degrees (± 2.32?degrees [-2.99–3.31]), CT versus DM 1.96?degrees (± 1.99?degrees [?2.2–4.27]), CPAD versus DM1.74?degrees (±2.21?degrees [?1.13 and 5.24]). The mean difference (SD [CI]) for version was CT versus CPAD 2.86?degrees (±1.56?degrees [ ?2.63–1.69]), CT versus DM 1.10?degrees (±1.42?degrees [?1.57–2.09]), CPAD versus DM 1.07?degrees (±0.76?degrees [0.13–2.09]). Clinical Relevance?The results demonstrate that intraoperative imaging in cadaveric specimens with the CPAD is an accurate method to determine ALO and version of the acetabular component.
机译:目的呢?该研究的目的是比较使用与荧光透视成像成像的放射性杯式杯子位置评估装置确定的横向开口(ALO)和版本的测量值,以通过CT和尸体模型中的直接测量获得的测量。我们的零假设是通过技术测量的角度不会有任何差异。方法含有BFX髋臼组分的六个尸体。将CPAD放置并用荧光检查获得图像。测量从CPAD装置上的无线电通桥标记棒获得,并且计算了版本和ALO。 ALO和版本由CT和DM确定。使用双向分析的方差和广义线性模型程序分析进行比较。结果?alo的测量没有显着差异(p?= 0.275)或版本(p?= 0.226)。方法之间的相关性分别为0.948和0.951,用于ALO和版本。 ALO的平均差异(标准偏差[SD]和95%置信区间[CI])是:CT与CPAD 1.85?度(±2.32?度[-2.99-3.31]),CT与DM 1.96?度(± 1.99?度[?2.2-4.27]),CPAD与DM1.74?度(±2.21?度[?1.13和5.24])。版本的平均差异(sd CPAD与DM 1.07?度(±0.76?度[0.13-2.09])。临床相关性?结果表明,在尸体上的术中成像与CPAD是确定ALO和髋臼部件的alo和版本的准确方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号