...
首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Content Validity-Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2-Assessing Respondent Understanding
【24h】

Content Validity-Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2-Assessing Respondent Understanding

机译:内容有效性 - 建立和报告新开发的患者报告的结果(Pro)医疗产品评估仪器的证据:ISPOR Pro良好的研究实践工作组报告:第2部分 - 评估受访者的理解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The importance of content validity in developing patient reported outcomes (PRO) instruments is stressed by both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. Content validity is the extent to which an instrument measures the important aspects of concepts developers or users purport it to assess. A PRO instrument measures the concepts most relevant and important to a patient's condition and its treatment. For PRO instruments, items and domains as reflected in the scores of an instrument should be important to the target population and comprehensive with respect to patient concerns. Documentation of target population input in item generation, as well as evaluation of patient understanding through cognitive interviewing, can provide the evidence for content validity. Part 1 of this task force report covers elicitation of key concepts using qualitative focus groups and/or interviews to inform content and structure of a new PRO instrument. Building on qualitative interviews and focus groups used to elicit concepts, cognitive interviews help developers craft items that can be understood byrespondents in the target population and can ultimately confirm that the final instrument is appropriate, comprehensive, and understandable in the target population. Part 2 details: 1) the methods for conducting cognitive interviews that address patient understanding of items, instructions, and response options; and 2) the methods for tracking item development through the various stages of research and preparing this tracking for submission to regulatory agencies. The task force report's two parts are meant to be read together. They are intended to offer suggestions for good practice in planning, executing, and documenting qualitative studies that are used to support the content validity of PRO instruments to be used in medical product evaluation.
机译:美国食品和药物管理局和欧洲药物局的含量有效期内容有效期的重要性报告的结果内容有效性是仪器测量概念开发人员或用户声称评估的重要方面的程度。专业仪器测量对患者病症及其治疗最相关和重要的概念。对于专业仪器,物品和域名反映在仪器的分数中应该对目标人口很重要,并对患者的担忧进行全面。项目生成中目标人口的文件,以及通过认知面试评估患者的理解,可以提供内容有效性的证据。本工作组的第1部分涵盖使用定性焦点小组和/或访谈来告知新型专业仪器的内容和结构的关键概念的引发。建立在用于引出概念的定性访谈和焦点小组,认知访谈有助于开发人员可以在目标人口中理解的工艺品,最终可以确认最终的仪器是适当的,全面的,在目标人口中可以理解。第2部分详情:1)进行认知访谈的方法,以解决患者对物品,指示和响应选项的理解; 2)通过各种研究阶段跟踪项目开发的方法,并准备这追踪提交给监管机构。特遣部队报告的两部分意味着可以一起阅读。他们旨在提供用于规划,执行和记录的定性研究的良好做法建议,这些研究用于支持在医疗产品评估中使用的Pro仪器的内容有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号