首页> 外文期刊>AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology >Identification of intraplaque hemorrhage on MR angiography images: a comparison of contrast-enhanced mask and time-of-flight techniques.
【24h】

Identification of intraplaque hemorrhage on MR angiography images: a comparison of contrast-enhanced mask and time-of-flight techniques.

机译:MR血管造影图像上斑块内出血的识别:对比增强型面罩和飞行时间技术的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MRA is widely used to measure carotid narrowing. Standard CE- and TOF-MRA techniques use highly T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences that can detect T1 short blood products, so they have the potential to identify IPH, an indicator of plaque rupture. We sought to determine the accuracy and reliability of these MRA sequences to detect IPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D TOF and CE carotid MRA scans were obtained at 3T on 15 patients (age range, 58-86 years; 13 men) scheduled for CEA. The source images from the precontrast (mask) CE-MRA and the TOF sequences were reviewed by 2 independent readers for IPH presence (identified as hyperintense signal intensity compared with adjacent muscle). CEA specimens were stained with antibody against glycophorin A and Mallory stain to detect IPH and were correlated with MR images. RESULTS: Nine of 15 CEA specimens (61 of 144 MR images) contained IPH confirmed by histology. Compared with TOF, CE-MRA mask demonstrated greater sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for IPH detection. The accuracy for correctly identifying IPH by using CE-MRA mask images and TOF images was 94% and 84%, respectively. Inter- and intraobserver agreement for IPH detection was excellent by mask images (kappa = 0.91 and kappa = 0.94, respectively) and TOF images (kappa = 0.77 and kappa = 0.84, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CE-MRA mask images are highly accurate and reliable for identifying IPH, more so than the TOF sequence, and can potentially provide valuable information about risk for rupture.
机译:背景与目的:MRA被广泛用于测量颈动脉狭窄。标准的CE和TOF-MRA技术使用高度T1加权的梯度回波序列,可以检测T1短血产物,因此它们具有识别IPH(斑块破裂的指标)的潜力。我们试图确定这些MRA序列检测IPH的准确性和可靠性。材料与方法:3T TOF和CE颈动脉MRA扫描是在3T时对计划进行CEA的15例患者(年龄范围为58-86岁; 13名男性)进行的。来自2个独立阅读器的IPH的存在(来自对比前(遮罩)CE-MRA和TOF序列的源图像)进行了检查(确定为与相邻肌肉比较的高强度信号强度)。 CEA标本用抗糖蛋白A和Mallory染色的抗体染色以检测IPH,并与MR图像相关。结果:15个CEA标本中的9个(144个MR图像中的61个)包含经组织学确认的IPH。与TOF相比,CE-MRA口罩对IPH检测具有更高的灵敏度,特异性,PPV和NPV。通过使用CE-MRA遮罩图像和TOF图像正确识别IPH的准确性分别为94%和84%。 IPH检测的观察者之间和观察者内部一致性非常好,其遮罩图像(分别为kappa = 0.91和kappa = 0.94)和TOF图像(分别为kappa = 0.77和kappa = 0.84)。结论:CE-MRA口罩图像比TOF序列具有更高的准确度和可靠性,可用于识别IPH,并且可以潜在地提供有关破裂风险的有价值的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号