...
首页> 外文期刊>Alcoholism: Clinical and experimental research >Emergency department-based brief intervention to reduce risky driving and hazardous/harmful drinking in young adults: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Emergency department-based brief intervention to reduce risky driving and hazardous/harmful drinking in young adults: A randomized controlled trial

机译:基于急诊科的短期干预措施,以减少年轻人的危险驾驶和有害/有害饮酒:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Risky driving and hazardous drinking are associated with significant human and economic costs. Brief interventions for more than one risky behavior have the potential to reduce health-compromising behaviors in populations with multiple risk-taking behaviors such as young adults. Emergency department (ED) visits provide a window of opportunity for interventions meant to reduce both risky driving and hazardous drinking. Methods: We determined the efficacy of a Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) protocol addressing risky driving and hazardous drinking. We used a randomized controlled trial design with follow-ups through 12 months. ED patients aged 18 to 44 who screened positive for both behaviors (n = 476) were randomized to brief intervention (BIG), contact control (CCG), or no-contact control (NCG) groups. The BIG (n = 150) received a 20-minute assessment and two 20-minute interventions. The CCG (n = 162) received a 20-minute assessment at baseline and no intervention. The NCG (n = 164) were asked for contact information at baseline and had no assessment or intervention. Outcomes at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were self-reported driving behaviors and alcohol consumption. Results: Outcomes were significantly lower in BIG compared with CCG through 6 or 9 months, but not at 12 months: Safety belt use at 3 months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 0.65); 6 months (AOR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.42); and 9 months (AOR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.56); binge drinking at 3 months (adjusted rate ratio [ARR] 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.97) and 6 months (ARR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.97); and ≥5 standard drinks/d at 3 months (AOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.91) and 6 months (AOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.98). No substantial differences were observed between BIG and NCG at 12 months. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that SBIRT reduced risky driving and hazardous drinking in young adults, but its effects did not persist after 9 months. Future research should explore methods for extending the intervention effect.
机译:背景:危险驾驶和危险饮酒会带来巨大的人力和经济成本。对一种以上危险行为的简短干预措施有可能减少具有多种冒险行为的人群(如年轻人)中损害健康的行为。急诊部(ED)的访问为旨在减少危险驾驶和有害饮酒的干预措施提供了机会之窗。方法:我们确定了针对危险驾驶和危险饮酒的筛查,简短干预和转诊治疗(SBIRT)方案的功效。我们使用了一项随机对照试验设计,并随访了12个月。筛查两种行为均阳性的18至44岁ED患者(n = 476)被随机分为短暂干预(BIG),接触控制(CCG)或无接触控制(NCG)组。 BIG(n = 150)接受了20分钟的评估和两次20分钟的干预。 CCG(n = 162)在基线时接受了20分钟的评估,没有干预。在基线时要求NCG(n = 164)提供联系信息,并且没有评估或干预。在3、6、9和12个月时的结果是自我报告的驾驶行为和饮酒。结果:与CCG相比,在6个月或9个月时,BIG的结果显着降低,但在12个月时没有:在3个月时使用安全带(调整后的优势比[AOR]为0.22; 95%置信区间[CI]为0.08至0.65 ); 6个月(AOR,0.13; 95%CI,0.04至0.42);和9个月(AOR,0.18; 95%CI,0.06至0.56);狂饮3个月(调整比率[ARR] 0.84; 95%CI,0.74至0.97)和6个月(ARR,0.81; 95%CI,0.67至0.97);和3个月(AOR,0.43; 95%CI,0.20至0.91)和6个月(AOR,0.41; 95%CI,0.17至0.98)≥5标准饮料/天。在12个月时,BIG和NCG之间没有观察到实质性差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,SBIRT可以减少年轻人的危险驾驶和有害饮酒,但其效果在9个月后并未持续。未来的研究应探索扩大干预效果的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号