首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Comparison of three-point belt fit between humans and Hybrid-III anthropometric test devices in a driver mockup
【24h】

Comparison of three-point belt fit between humans and Hybrid-III anthropometric test devices in a driver mockup

机译:三点带适于驾驶员样机中的三点带适应的人和杂交型 - III人体测量试验装置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: The Hybrid-III anthropometric test devices (ATDs) are widely used by the automotive industry to evaluate restraint system performance in standardized vehicle crash tests. The relationship between the belt fit measured for people in driving posture and the belt fit obtained with ATDs has not been reported in the literature. The present study compares lap and shoulder belt fit data from ATDs and to a statistical estimate for drivers using age, stature, and BMI. Methods: The lap and shoulder belt fits were measured for small-female and midsize-male Hybrid-III ATDs in a laboratory mockup of a midsize sedan. A range of lower and upper belt anchorage locations were used. The ATD belt fit data were compared with predictions from a regression model developed by data from 97 men and women measured in the same driving package conditions. Humans were free to position the belt comfortably, even if the position was not optimal. Results: The measurements of the ATD belt fit were obtained and compared to the regression estimate for a driver using age, stature, and BMI as predictors. For the small female, the ATD's lap belt was placed 46 mm further forward and 12 mm lower relative to the pelvis than the regression model estimates for a driver's lap belt placement. For the midsize male, the lap portion of the belt was placed 13 mm more rearward and 33 mm lower on the physical ATD than the regression model estimates for a similarly sized driver. The shoulder belt was placed an average of 66 mm more inboard and 11 mm more outboard on the small-female and midsize-male physical ATDs, respectively, compared with regression model estimates for drivers. Conclusions: Differences in the lap and shoulder belt fits were quantified between the physical ATDs and regression predictions for similarly sized humans in driving postures. The consequences of these differences should be investigated to help increase understanding of the relationship between belt fit and belt performance.
机译:目的:杂交-III人体计量试验装置(ATDS)被汽车工业广泛应用于评估标准化车辆碰撞试验中的约束系统性能。在文献中,尚未在文献中报道用于驱动姿势的人员和带ATDS获得的带拟合之间测量的皮带配合之间的关系。本研究将LAP和肩带拟合数据与ATDS进行比较,并使用年龄,身材和BMI对司机的统计估计。方法:在中型轿车的实验室样机中测量膝部和肩带配合。使用了一系列下部和上部皮带锚固位置。将ATD带拟合数据与来自在同一驱动包裹条件中测量的97个男性和女性的数据开发的回归模型的预测进行了比较。即使位置不是最佳的,人类也可以自由地定位皮带。结果:获得了ATD带配合的测量,并与使用年龄,地形和BMI作为预测因子的驾驶员的回归估计进行比较。对于小型雌性,ATD的搭接带进一步向前46毫米,相对于骨盆相对于佩尔维斯,比驾驶员的搭接带放置的回归模型估计更低。对于中型阳,皮带的膝部部分放置13mm后方,物理ATD上的33mm比类似尺寸的驾驶员的回归模型估计更低。与司机的回归模型估计相比,肩带分别平均放置66毫米的舷内和11mm,在小女性和中型男性身体ATD上。结论:在驾驶姿势的类似尺寸尺寸的人类的物理到期和回归预测之间量化了膝盖和肩带的差异。应调查这些差异的后果,以帮助增加对皮带配合和皮带性能之间的关系的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号