...
首页> 外文期刊>Toxicology and Industrial Health >Spirometric reference values in the occupational medicine practice
【24h】

Spirometric reference values in the occupational medicine practice

机译:职业医学实践中的肺活量参考值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Spirometry is the main pulmonary function test routinely employed in the occupational medicine practice. Its interpretation depends on the choice of the theoretical reference values. Therefore, our objective was to retrospectively evaluate the differences in the spirometric interpretation according to the reference values used. Methods: A total of 2462 spirometries performed during health surveillance programs were analyzed. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV_(1)), and FEV_(1)/FVC ratio were compared according to three different reference values: the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) 1971, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) 1993, and the Global Lung Initiative (GLI) 2012. Results: The GLI 2012 provided significantly higher predicted mean FVC and FEV_(1)values compared to the ERS 1993 and significantly lower compared to the ECSC 1971. The GLI 2012 were able to detect all the obstructive deficits and mixed patterns diagnosed with ECSC 1971 and ERS 1993, in addition to others not diagnosed by these two latter reference values. The number of restrictive patterns identified through the GLI 2012 was significantly reduced and increased compared to those diagnosed using the ECSC 1971 and the ERS 1993, respectively. Discussion: In comparison to the GLI 2012, the ERS 1993 values significantly underestimated obstructive and restrictive alterations. Conversely, the ECSC 1971 significantly underestimated obstructive changes, while overestimated restrictive patterns, compared to GLI. Although the GLI reference values may provide a correct spirometric interpretation, their validation in an Italian worker population is necessary to confirm their possible use in routine occupational health programs.
机译:介绍:肺活量测量是职业医学实践中经常使用的主要肺功能测试。其解释取决于理论参考值的选择。因此,我们的目的是回顾性地根据所使用的参考值评估血管算法解释的差异。方法:分析了在卫生监测方案期间进行的共进行2462纹螺旋状物。强制生命能力(FVC),一秒强制呼气量(FEV_(1))和FEV_(1)/ FVC比率根据三种不同的参考价值进行比较:欧洲煤炭和钢铁社区(ECSC)1971年,欧洲呼吸协会(ERS)1993年和全球肺倡议(GLI)2012年。结果:与ECSC 1971相比,GLI 2012提供了更高的预测平均FVC和FEV_(1)值,并与ECSC相比显着降低。GLI 2012年能够检测到诊断出与ECSC 1971和IRS 1993的所有阻塞性缺陷和混合模式,除了不被这两个后一种参考值诊断的其他人。与使用ECSC 1971和ED 1993的诊断的人相比,通过GLI 2012鉴定的限制模式的数量显着降低和增加。讨论:与GLI 2012相比,ERS 1993价值观明显低估了阻碍性和限制性的改变。相反,与GLI相比,ECSC 1971显着低估了阻碍性变化,而过高的限制性模式。虽然GLI参考值可以提供正确的肌肉解释,但他们在意大利工人人口中的验证是必要的,以确认他们在常规职业健康计划中使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号