首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >EFFECTS OF MANURE STORAGE ADDITIVES ON MANURE COMPOSITION AND GREENHOUSE GAS AND AMMONIA EMISSIONS
【24h】

EFFECTS OF MANURE STORAGE ADDITIVES ON MANURE COMPOSITION AND GREENHOUSE GAS AND AMMONIA EMISSIONS

机译:肥料储存添加剂对粪肥组成和温室气体和氨排放的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Storage of dairy manure slurry allows flexibility in the timing of land application of manure to reduce environmental impacts related to water quality. However, manure storage can increase greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions and cause operational issues due to the buildup of slurry solids. To combat these negative consequences, stored manure was treated with manure additives, i.e., More than Manure (MTM), Pro-Act Biotech (Pro-Act), and biochar, to quantify their effects on manure solids, nitrogen losses, and GHG emissions in two separate trails. Gaseous emissions were studied over a 48-day manure storage period with treatments of MTM, Pro-Act, aeration and Pro-Act, aeration alone, and biochar. Manure characteristics were further examined in a 28-day manure storage study with treatments of MTM at the supplier-recommended rate, MTM at 25x the recommended rate, aeration and Pro-Act at the supplier-recommended rate, aeration and Pro-Act at 10. the recommended rate, aeration alone, and two additional Pro-Act treatments without aeration, one at the recommended rate and one at 10x that rate. Biochar was the only manure treatment to impact manure characteristics, with significantly more ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) on day 14 than the control (p 0.012) in the manure composition study. Biochar did not reduce NH3 emissions from the control, likely due to the 10 cm natural crust on the control. MTM increased CO2 emissions, with significantly higher emissions on days 7 and 14 during the gaseous emissions study. Overall, no treatments were able to reduce manure solids or nitrogen emissions for these manure storage conditions.
机译:乳制品肥料的储存允许灵活性在粪肥的土地应用时机,以减少与水质有关的环境影响。然而,粪便储存可以增加温室气体(GHG)和氨(NH3)排放,并导致浆液固体的堆积导致操作问题。为了对抗这些负面后果,用粪便添加剂处理储存粪便,即粪肥(MTM),Pro-Act Biotech(Pro-Act)和BioChar,以量化它们对粪肥固体,氮损失和温室气体排放的影响在两个单独的小径中。在48天的粪便储存期间采用气体排放,采用MTM,Pro-Act,Aower,Aerofal,Aercon和Pro-Act,曝气和BioChar的处理。在28天的粪便储存研究中进一步研究了MTM的28天粪便储存研究,以供应商推荐的速率,MTM以25倍,推荐的速度,曝气和PRO-ACT以供应商推荐的速度,曝气和PRO-ACT在10次。推荐的速度,单独曝气,以及两种额外的PRO-ACT治疗,没有通用,一个以推荐的速度,一个率为10倍。生物炭是植物植物特征的唯一粪便治疗,在粪便成分研究中的对照(P <0.012)时,在第14天具有显着更多的氨氮(TAN)。 BioChar没有从控制中降低NH3排放,可能由于控制器上的10厘米天然地壳。 MTM增加了二氧化碳排放,在气态排放研究期间,第7天和第14天的排放显着较高。总的来说,没有治疗能够减少粪肥固体或氮排放以进行这些粪肥储存条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号