首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >CROP YIELD AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY AS AFFECTED BY DIFFERENT SOIL-BASED MANAGEMENT METHODS FOR VARIABLE-RATE IRRIGATION IN A SEMI-HUMID CLIMATE
【24h】

CROP YIELD AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY AS AFFECTED BY DIFFERENT SOIL-BASED MANAGEMENT METHODS FOR VARIABLE-RATE IRRIGATION IN A SEMI-HUMID CLIMATE

机译:作物产量和水利用效率受到半潮湿气候的不同土壤基础管理方法的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To improve the management of variable-rate irrigation (VRI) systems in semi-humid climates, three different soil-based irrigation management methods were evaluated on their potential for reducing irrigation water use and maximizing crop yield and water use efficiency (WUE) during the 2016 and 2017 growing seasons of summer maize in the North China Plain. The three irrigation management methods evaluated were soil water balance modeling (SWB), measured soil water content (SWC), and a combination of SWB and the rain forecast for the next three days (RF). The experiments were implemented on four management zones delineated by available soil water holding capacity of a center-pivot VRI system. A similar irrigation trigger point (70% of field capacity) was used for the three irrigation management methods in the four management zones. In the two seasons, the total water application in the SWC treatments varied in a larger range among the management zones, and the irrigation water applied was 22% and 21% less than in the SWB and RF treatments, respectively. Similar yields were obtained among the irrigation management methods in both seasons. The maximum WUE was always observed with the SWC treatments for the four management zones in the 2017 season. The WUE with the SWC treatments was 36% and 23% higher than with the SWB and RF treatments, respectively. Considering the amount of irrigation water applied, yield, and WUE, our results demonstrated that the SWC method was more suitable for VRI management than the SWB and RF methods in this semi-humid climate.
机译:为了改善半潮湿气候中的可变速率灌溉(VRI)系统的管理,评估了三种不同的土壤灌溉管理方法,以减少灌溉用水和最大化作物产量和水使用效率(WUE)的潜力2016年和2017年夏季玉米生长季节在华北平原。评估的三种灌溉管理方法是土壤水平建模(SWB),测量土壤含水量(SWC),以及下一个三天的SWB和雨量预测的组合(RF)。该实验在由可用的枢纽持续的vri系统的可用土壤漏水容量划定的四个管理区实施。类似的灌溉触发点(70%的现场容量)用于四个管理区的三种灌溉管理方法。在两种赛季中,SWC处理中的总水应用在管理区中的较大范围内变化,施加的灌溉水分分别比SWB和RF处理小于22%和21%。在两个季节的灌溉管理方法中获得了类似的产量。在2017赛季中的四个管理区的SWC处理总是观察到最大WUE。随着SWC治疗的WUE分别比SWB和RF治疗高36%和23%。考虑到灌溉水量,产量和WUE,我们的结果表明,SWC方法更适合于VRI管理,而不是这种半潮湿气候中的SWB和RF方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transactions of the ASABE》 |2018年第6期|共8页
  • 作者

    Li X.; Zhao W.; Li J.; Li Y.;

  • 作者单位

    China Inst Water Resources &

    Hydropower Res State Key Lab Simulat &

    Regulat Water Cycle River Beijing Peoples R China;

    China Inst Water Resources &

    Hydropower Res State Key Lab Simulat &

    Regulat Water Cycle River Beijing Peoples R China;

    China Inst Water Resources &

    Hydropower Res State Key Lab Simulat &

    Regulat Water Cycle River Beijing Peoples R China;

    China Inst Water Resources &

    Hydropower Res State Key Lab Simulat &

    Regulat Water Cycle River Beijing Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农业科学;
  • 关键词

    Center pivot; Soil water balance; Soil water content; Rain forecast; Summer maize; Yield;

    机译:中心枢轴;土壤水平;土壤含水量;雨预报;夏季玉米;产量;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号