首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic Drug Monitoring >Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Drug Monitoring of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants: Where Do We Stand?
【24h】

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Drug Monitoring of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants: Where Do We Stand?

机译:直接作用口腔抗凝剂的药代动力学和药效学药物监测:我们在哪里站立?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For decades, oral anticoagulation has been based on vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin, which requires pharmacodynamic (PD) drug monitoring to guide the therapy. The drug effect is measured by the clotting test prothrombin time and expressed as international normalized ratio. New direct oral anticoagulants are increasingly used in fixed-dose regimens but are licensed without any therapy monitoring. However, extensive clinical experiences have demonstrated that interindividual variations in the response to the therapy with direct oral anticoagulants do exist. In situations such as bleeding or thrombosis, therapeutic drug monitoring could be useful. Unfortunately, global coagulation assays such as the prothrombin time or the activated partial thrombin time are not suitable for this purpose. To measure drug concentrations, more specific coagulation test can be used if they are externally calibrated with the respective drugs. For the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate, a calibrated diluted thrombin time or ecarin clotting time can be used, whereas for anti-factor Xa drugs such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban, calibrated anti-factor Xa assays are appropriate. However, the gold standard to measure drug concentrations is LC-MS/MS. The variation in bleeding and thrombotic events noted with both drug classes under fixed-dose conditions suggests additional interindividual PD differences. Therefore, PD monitoring to individualize the therapy may be an option. For dabigatran, this is the inhibition of thrombin formation and for antifactor Xa drugs, the inhibition of factor Xa activity, which can be followed using the functional assays mentioned above but without calibration. Alternatively, thrombin generation assays have been proposed for both drug classes. So far, not many clinical data have been published about the potentially beneficial effects of PD monitoring for dose individualization. The assay platforms for PD monitoring are present in many clinical laboratories, but efforts are needed to validate and standardize available assays to perform appropriate clinical trials.
机译:几十年来,口服抗凝基于维生素K拮抗剂,如华法林,这需要药物动力学(PD)药物监测来引导治疗。药物效果通过凝血试验凝血酶原时间测量并表示为国际归一化比率。新的直接口服抗凝血剂越来越多地用于固定剂量方案,但没有任何治疗监测的许可。然而,广泛的临床经验表明,存在与直接口服抗凝血剂的治疗的反应的相互作用。在出血或血栓形成的情况下,治疗药物监测可能是有用的。遗憾的是,诸如凝血酶原时间或活化的部分凝血酶时间的全局凝血测定不适合于此目的。为了测量药物浓度,如果与各自的药物外部校准,可以使用更具体的凝血试验。对于直接凝血酶抑制剂Dabigatran Etexilate,可以使用校准的稀释凝血酶时间或eCarin凝血素时间,而对于抗因子XA药物如蓖麻,甲嘧屈,赤鳞蛋白和β甲烷,校准的抗因子XA测定是合适的。然而,测量药物浓度的金标是LC-MS / MS。在固定剂量条件下,用两种药物课程注意到的出血和血栓形成事件的变化表明额外的接口PD差异。因此,PD监测对孤立的个性化可能是一种选择。对于Dabigatran,这是抑制凝血酶形成和用于抗actactor Xa药物,抑制因子Xa活性,其可以使用上述功能测定但没有校准。或者,已经提出了两种药物类别的凝血酶产生测定。到目前为止,没有许多临床数据公布了PD监测剂量个体的潜在有益效果。 PD监测的测定平台存​​在于许多临床实验室中,但需要努力验证和标准化可用的测定以进行适当的临床试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号