首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >Feasibility of single- vs two-physician procedural sedation in a small community emergency department
【24h】

Feasibility of single- vs two-physician procedural sedation in a small community emergency department

机译:小型社区急诊部门的单一与二医生程序镇静的可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Sedation is commonly required for painful procedures in the emergency department (ED). Some facilities mandate two physicians be present for deep sedation cases. Evidence is lacking, however, that a two-physician approach improves safety outcomes. We report our experience on the feasibility of replacing a two-physician ED procedural sedation policy with a single-physician policy in a small, single-coverage community ED.
机译:目的:镇静急救程序(ED)疼痛程序常见。 有些设施授权两个医生出现深镇静案件。 然而,缺乏证据,两位医生方法改善了安全结果。 我们报告了我们对替换双医生ED程序镇静政策的可行性,以小单一的单一覆盖社区编辑的单一医生政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号