首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Benefit of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants Versus Enoxaparin Thromboprophylaxis to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism Among Hospitalized Patients
【24h】

Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Benefit of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants Versus Enoxaparin Thromboprophylaxis to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism Among Hospitalized Patients

机译:荟萃分析比较直接作用口服抗凝血剂与亚诺帕林血栓性血栓形成的疗效,安全性和成本效益,以防止住院患者的静脉血栓栓塞

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially fatal complication of hospitalization. Thromboprophylaxis using subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) can result in local irritation, pain, and ecchymoses, leading to nonadherence. Direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an alternative, but their efficacy and safety for short-term inpatient-only use versus LMWH, in medically hospitalized patients, has not been rigorously assessed. We performed a systematic review with meta-analyses and exploratory cost effectiveness analysis of Phase III randomized controlled trials comparing DOACs to LMWH for VTE prophylaxis to determine the risk and benefit of each. The primary efficacy end point (composite of total VTE and any-cause mortality) occurred in 1,321 of 10,978 (11.4%) of patients receiving DOAC prophylaxis and 1,084 of 10,600 (10.2%) with LMWH (odds ratio [OR] 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 1.13). The primary safety end point (composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant bleeding) occurred in 519 of 16,131 (3.2%) of patients receiving DOACs and 381 of 14,616 (2.6%) with LMWH (OR 1.12; 95%CI 0.83 to 1.53). Subgroup analyses for efficacy (n?=?9,233) and safety (n?=?12,584) was conducted on patients randomized to Apixaban or LMWH. The primary efficacy end point occurred in 294 of 4618 (6.4%) patients on Apixaban and 383 of 4615 (8.3%) on Enoxaparin (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.24). Major and clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 157 of 6278 (2.50%) and 185 of 6,306 (2.9%), respectively (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.26). Exploratory cost effectiveness analysis suggested that Apixaban compared with Enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis could result in long-term cost savings. In conclusion, this systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis, stratified by type of patients and drug, indicates noninferiority of DOACs in efficacy, safety, and cost for short-term VTE thromboprophylaxis among patients hospitalized for medical illness.
机译:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是住院治疗的潜在致命并发症。使用皮下低分子量肝素(LMWH)的血栓血管脂可能导致局部刺激,疼痛和瘀斑,导致不正常。直接代理口服抗凝血剂(DOACS)是一种替代品,但它们在医疗治疗的患者中,唯一只有LMWH的短期内关节使用的疗效和安全性并未严格评估。我们对Meta分析进行了系统审查,并对DOACS对VTE预防的LMWH进行了阶段随机对照试验的探索性成本效益分析,以确定每种情况的风险和益处。在10,978名(11.4%)的1,321名患者中发生初级疗效终点(总VTE和任何原因死亡率)发生,接受DOAC预防和10,600(10.2%)的1,084(10.2%),LMWH(差距[或] 0.84; 95%)置信区间[CI] 0.63至1.13)。在16,131(3.2%)的患者中发生的初级安全终点(主要出血和临床相关出血的复合)发生,接受DOAC的患者,381名为14,616(2.6%),LMWH(或1.12; 95%CI 0.83至1.53)。对疗效分析的亚组分析(n?= 9,233)和安全(n?= 12,584),对随机化为紫杉醇或LMWh的患者进行。初级疗效终点发生在4618(6.4%)甲氧吩上的4618名(6.4%)患者的294名,烯库蛋白(或0.82; 95%CI 0.55至1.24)的4615(8.3%)。主要和临床相关的出血分别发生在6278(2.50%)和185例,分别为6,306(2.9%)(或0.86; 95%CI 0.58至1.26)。探索性成本效益分析表明,与亚诺帕林血栓血管薄皮相比,Apixaban可能会节省长期成本。总之,通过患者和药物类型分层的随机对照试验和荟萃分析的这种系统审查表明,对于医疗疾病住院的患者,短期VTE血栓前血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血栓性血管缺陷的不合因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号