首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >In-Hospital Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock at Safety-Net Hospitals in the United States (from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample)
【24h】

In-Hospital Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock at Safety-Net Hospitals in the United States (from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample)

机译:ST段升高的医院结果心肌梗死复杂于美国安全网医院的心绞痛(来自全国住院病人样本)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) are hospitals that serve a higher proportion of patients insured by Medicaid or uninsured and have been reported to have poor outcomes compared with non-SNHs. Procedural and clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) at SNHs have not been well described. Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2011 was queried to identify STEMI-CS and age >= 18. SNHs were defined as hospitals with the highest number of inpatient stays that were paid by Medicaid or were uninsured (the top quartile). A total of 23,229 STEMI-CS of which 3,639 (15.7%) were treated at SNHs. Admissions to SNHs were younger (mean age 66.0 vs 67.2, p = 4 (25.8% vs 21.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). Percutaneous coronary interventions were less performed (60.4% vs 65.8%, p < 0.001) whereas administrations of thrombolysis (2.9% vs 2.1%, p = 0.001) were more frequent at SNHs. Coronary artery bypass and the use of mechanical circulatory support was similar. In-hospital mortality was significantly elevated at SNHs (36.6% vs 32.7%, adjusted odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.39) whereas new dialysis, stroke, and fatal arrhythmias were similar. The median length of stay was similar (6 vs 7 days, p = 0.58) but the median cost was higher (40,175 vs 38,012 US dollars, p = 0.01) at SNHs. SNHs had lower utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention and higher in-hospital mortality compared with non-SNHs in STEMI-CS. Further cause analysis is warranted to improve outcomes of STEMI-CS admitted at SNHs. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:安全网医院(SNHS)是医院的医院,用于由医疗补助保险或未保险的患者提供更高比例的患者,并据报道,与非SNHS相比具有差的结果。 ST段升高的程序和临床结果在SNHS时由心肌休克(Stemi-CS)复杂化的心肌梗死复杂。 2005年至2011年的全国住院性样本被询问识别Stemi-CS和年龄> = 18. SENS被定义为医疗补助或未保险的住院入住住院数量最多的医院(顶部四分位数)。共有23,229个干燥剂,其中3,639(15.7%)在SNHS处理。入学们对SNHS较年轻(平均年龄为66.0 vs 67.2,P = 4(分别为21.9%,P <0.001)。较少进行经皮冠状动脉干预(60.4%vs 65.8%,p <0.001),而溶栓栓塞(2.9%vs 2.1%,p = 0.001)在SNHS时更频繁。冠状动脉旁路和机械循环载体的使用相似。在医院死亡率在SNHS中显着升高(36.6%与32.7%,调整的赔率比1.24 ,95%的置信区间1.10至1.39),而新的透析,中风和致命的心律失常相似。中位的住宿时间相似(6 vs 7天,P = 0.58),但中位数成本更高(40,175与38,012美元在snhs时,p = 0.01)。与stemi-cs中的非SNHS相比,SNHs利用经皮冠状动脉干预和高患儿的入院性死亡率。有必要进行进一步的原因分析,以改善在SNHS时入院的STEMI-CS的结果。(C )2019年Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号