首页> 外文期刊>AIDS care. >HIV-related medical service use by rural/urban residents: a multistate perspective.
【24h】

HIV-related medical service use by rural/urban residents: a multistate perspective.

机译:农村/城市居民使用艾滋病毒相关的医疗服务:多州视角。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Geographic location may be related to the receipt of quality HIV health care services. Clinical outcomes and health care utilization were evaluated in rural, urban, and peri-urban patients seen at high-volume US urban-based HIV care sites. METHODS: Zip codes for 8773 HIV patients followed in 2005 at seven HIV Research Network sites were categorized as rural (population <10,000), peri-urban (10,000-100,000), and urban (>100,000). Clinical and demographic characteristics, inpatient and outpatient (OP) utilization, AIDS-defining illness rates, receipt of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis usage, and virologic suppression were compared among patients, using chi(2) tests for categorical variables, t-tests for means, and logistic regression for HAART utilization. RESULTS: HIV-infected rural (n=170) and peri-urban (n=215) patients were less likely to be Black or Hispanic than urban HIV patients. Peri-urban subjects were more likely to report MSM as their HIV risk factor than rural or urban subjects. Age, gender, CD4 or HIV-RNA distribution, virologic suppression, HAART usage, or OI prophylaxis did not differ by geographic location. In multivariate analysis, rural and peri-urban patients were less likely to have four or more annual outpatient visits than urban patients. Rural patients were less likely to receive HAART if they were Black. Overall, geographic location (as defined by home zip code) did not affect receipt of HAART or OI prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Although demographic and health care utilization differences were seen among rural, peri-urban, and urban HIV patients, most HIV outcomes and medication use were comparable across geographic areas. As with HIV care for urban-dwelling patients, areas for improvement for non-urban HIV patients include access to HAART among minorities and injection drug users.
机译:目的:地理位置可能与接收高质量的HIV保健服务有关。对在美国大量基于城市的HIV护理场所看到的农村,城市和城郊患者的临床结局和医疗保健利用进行了评估。方法:2005年遵循的7773个HIV研究网络站点的8773名HIV患者的邮政编码被分类为农村(人口<10,000),城市周边(10,000-100,000)和城市(> 100,000)。使用chi(2)比较了患者的临床和人口统计学特征,住院和门诊(OP)使用率,定义艾滋病的发病率,接受高效抗逆转录病毒疗法(HAART),机会性感染(OI)预防使用和病毒抑制作用对分类变量进行检验,对均值进行t检验,对HAART利用率进行逻辑回归。结果:感染艾滋病毒的农村地区(n = 170)和城市周边地区(n = 215)患者的黑人或西班牙裔患者比城市艾滋病毒患者少。与农村或城市受试者相比,城郊受试者更有可能将MSM报告为其HIV危险因素。年龄,性别,CD4或HIV-RNA分布,病毒学抑制,HAART使用或OI预防因地理位置而异。在多变量分析中,与城市患者相比,农村和城市近郊患者每年门诊四次或更多的可能性较小。农村患者如果是黑人则不太可能接受HAART。总体而言,地理位置(由家庭邮政编码定义)不会影响对HAART或OI预防措施的接收。结论:尽管在农村,城郊和城市艾滋病毒患者中发现人口和医疗保健利用差异,但大多数艾滋病毒的结局和药物使用在不同地区之间是可比的。与为城市居民提供艾滋病毒护理一样,非城市艾滋病毒患者需要改善的地方包括少数民族和注射吸毒者可以使用HAART。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号