首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Evidence-based review of trauma center care and routine palliative care processes for geriatric trauma patients; A collaboration from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Patient Assessment Committee, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Geriatric Trauma Committee, and the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Guidelines Committee
【24h】

Evidence-based review of trauma center care and routine palliative care processes for geriatric trauma patients; A collaboration from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Patient Assessment Committee, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Geriatric Trauma Committee, and the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Guidelines Committee

机译:基于证据的特征创伤患者创伤中心护理和常规姑息治疗过程; 美国患者患者评估委员会外科术协会的合作,美国特拉乌利亚创伤委员会委员会的外科协会以及创伤指南委员会的东部外科委员会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND Despite an aging population and increasing number of geriatric trauma patients annually, gaps in our understanding of best practices for geriatric trauma patients persist. We know that trauma center care improves outcomes for injured patients generally, and palliative care processes can improve outcomes for disease-specific conditions, and our goal was to determine effectiveness of these interventions on outcomes for geriatric trauma patients. METHODS A priori questions were created regarding outcomes for patients 65 years or older with respect to care at trauma centers versus nontrauma centers and use of routine palliative care processes. A query of MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE was performed. Letters to the editor, case reports, book chapters, and review articles were excluded. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to perform a systematic review and create recommendations. RESULTS We reviewed seven articles relevant to trauma center care and nine articles reporting results on palliative care processes as they related to geriatric trauma patients. Given data quality and limitations, we conditionally recommend trauma center care for the severely injured geriatric trauma patients but are unable to make a recommendation on the question of routine palliative care processes for geriatric trauma patients. CONCLUSIONS As our older adult population increases, injured geriatric patients will continue to pose challenges for care, such as comorbidities or frailty. We found that trauma center care was associated with improved outcomes for geriatric trauma patients in most studies and that utilization of early palliative care consultations was generally associated with improved secondary outcomes, such as length of stay; however, inconsistency and imprecision prevented us from making a clear recommendation for this question. As caregivers, we should ensure adequate support for trauma systems and palliative care processes in our institutions and communities and continue to support robust research to study these and other aspects of geriatric trauma.
机译:背景,尽管人口老龄化,但每年越来越多的老年孕妇患者,我们对老年人创伤患者的最佳实践的理解差距仍然存在。我们知道,创伤中心护理通常会改善受伤患者的结果,而姑息治疗过程可以改善疾病特异性条件的结果,我们的目标是确定这些干预措施对老年人特征创伤患者的结果的有效性。方法对65岁或以上的患者的结果创建先验的问题,在创伤中心与非法统计中心和使用常规姑息治疗过程。进行了Medline,PubMed,Cochrane图书馆和Embase的查询。给编辑的信件,案例报告,书章节和审查文章被排除在外。等级(建议评估,发展和评估等级)方法学用于进行系统审查并创建建议。结果我们审查了与创伤中心护理和九章有关的七篇文章,并在与老年痛苦患者相关的姑息治疗过程中报告结果。鉴于数据质量和限制,我们有条件地推荐严重受伤的老年伤害患者的创伤中心护理,但无法提出关于老年人痛苦患者的常规姑息治疗过程问题的推荐。结论随着我们的老年人的成年人口增加,受伤的老年患者将继续对照顾的挑战,例如合并症或脆弱。我们发现创伤中心护理与大多数研究中的Geriatric创伤患者的改善结果有关,并且早期姑息治疗磋商的利用通常与改进的二次结果相关,例如逗留时间;但是,不一致和不精确阻止我们为此问题提出明确的建议。作为护理人员,我们应该确保对我们机构和社区的创伤系统和姑息治疗过程充分支持,并继续支持研究老年创伤的这些和其他方面的鲁棒研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号