首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Life-saving interventions in pediatric trauma: A National Trauma Data Bank experience
【24h】

Life-saving interventions in pediatric trauma: A National Trauma Data Bank experience

机译:儿科创伤的救生干预措施:全国创伤数据库经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND Emergent procedures are infrequent in pediatric trauma. We sought to determine the frequency and efficacy of life-saving interventions (LSI) performed for pediatric trauma patients within the first hour of care at a trauma center. METHODS The National Trauma Data Bank (2010-2014) was queried for patients 19 years or younger who underwent LSIs within 1 hour of arrival to the emergency department. Life-saving interventions included emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) and emergent airway procedures (EAP). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of patient and hospital characteristics on mortality. RESULTS Of 725,284 recorded traumatic encounters, only 1,488 (0.2%) pediatric patients underwent at least one of the defined LSI during the 5-year study period (EDT, 1,323; EAP, 187). Most patients (85.6%) were 15 years or older. Mortality was high but varied by procedure type (EDT, 64.3%; EAP, 28.3%). Mortality for patients younger than 1 year undergoing EDT was 100%, decreasing to 62.6% in patients aged 15 years to 19 years. For EAP, mortality ranged from 66.7% for infants to 27.2% in 15-year-old to 19-year-old patients. Lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, higher Injury Severity Score, presence of shock, and a blunt mechanism of injury were independently associated with mortality in the EDT cohort. On average, trauma centers in this study performed approximately one LSI per year, with only 13.8% of cases occurring at a verified pediatric trauma center. CONCLUSION Life-saving interventions in the pediatric trauma population are uncommon and outcomes variable. Novel solutions to keep proficient at such interventions should be sought, especially for younger children. Guidelines to improve identification of appropriate candidates for LSI are critical given their rare occurrence.
机译:背景紧急程序在儿科创伤中不常见。我们试图确定在Tauma中心的第一个小时内对儿科创伤患者进行救生干预措施(LSI)的频率和功效。方法对19年或更年轻的患者询问国家创伤数据库(2010-2014),何时在抵达急诊部门的1小时内完成LSIS。救生干预包括急诊部胸部胸部(EDT)和紧急气道程序(EAP)。多变量逻辑回归用于评估患者和医院特征对死亡率的影响。结果725,284记录的创伤性遭遇,只有1,488(0.2%)儿科患者在5年的研究期间介入至少一个定义的LSI(EDT,1,323; EAP,187)。大多数患者(85.6%)为15岁或以上。死亡率高但是通过程序类型(EDT,64.3%; EAP,28.3%)而变化。患者患者的死亡率为100%,患者达到15%,达到15岁至19年的患者递减为62.6%。对于EAP,死亡率范围为15岁至19岁患者的婴儿的66.7%至27.2%。降低格拉斯哥昏迷比分评分,伤害严重程度得分较高,存在冲击,损伤的钝机机制与EDT队列中的死亡率独立相关。平均而言,本研究中的创伤中心每年进行大约一个LSI,只有13.8%的病例发生在验证的儿科创伤中心。结论儿科创伤人群中的救生干预措施是罕见和结果的变化。应寻求更熟练在此类干预措施的新解决方案,特别是对于年幼的儿童来说。鉴于其罕见发生,改善LSI识别适当候选人的指导方针是至关重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号