...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Helmet use is associated with higher Injury Severity Scores in alpine skiers and snowboarders evaluated at a Level I trauma center
【24h】

Helmet use is associated with higher Injury Severity Scores in alpine skiers and snowboarders evaluated at a Level I trauma center

机译:头盔使用与高山滑雪者和在I级Trauma中心评估的滑雪板上的伤害严重程度相关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND There is uncertainty regarding the efficacy of ski helmets in preventing traumatic injury. We investigated the relationship between helmet use, injury types, and injury severity among skiers and snowboarders. METHODS The trauma registry at a Northeast American College of Surgeons Level I trauma center was queried by International Classification of Diseases Codes-9th or 10th Revision for skiing and snowboarding injury between 2010 and 2018. The primary exposure was helmet use and primary outcome was severe injury (Injury Severity Score >15). We performed univariate and multivariable logistic regression to assess for injury types and severity associated with helmet use. RESULTS Seven hundred twenty-one patients (65% helmeted, 35% unhelmeted) met inclusion criteria. Helmet use doubled during the study period (43% to 81%, p < 0.001), but the rate of any head injury did not significantly change (49% to 43%, p = 0.499). On multivariable regression, helmeted patients were significantly more likely to suffer severe injury (odds ratio [OR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-3.11), intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.10-2.96), chest injury (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.05-2.61), and/or lumbosacral spine injury (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.04-3.25) than unhelmeted patients. Helmeted patients were half as likely to suffer cervical spine injury (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30-0.89) and a third as likely to sustain skull fracture and/or scalp laceration (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64). More patients who hit a stationary object were helmeted compared with those who fell from standing height onto snow (70% vs. 56% respectively, p < 0.001). After adjustment, hitting a stationary object was the injury mechanism most significantly associated with severe injury (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.79-4.38). CONCLUSION Helmeted skiers and snowboarders evaluated at a Level I trauma center were more likely to suffer severe injury, including intracranial hemorrhage, as compared with unhelmeted participants. However, they were less likely to sustain skull fractures or cervical spine injuries. Helmeted patients were also more likely to hit a stationary object. Our findings reinforce the importance of safe skiing practices and trauma evaluation after high-impact injury, regardless of helmet use.
机译:背景技术有关滑雪头盔在预防创伤损伤方面的疗效存在不确定性。我们调查了滑雪者和滑雪板之间的头盔使用,伤害类型和伤害严重程度之间的关系。方法采用2010年至2018年间滑雪和滑雪板损伤的国际疾病代码-9日或第10次修订的国际疾病代码 - 第9段或第10次修订的国际疾病调控级,初级暴露,初级暴露,初级暴露是头盔使用,主要结果严重损伤(伤害严重程度分数> 15)。我们对与头盔使用相关的伤害类型和严重程度进行了单变量和多变量的逻辑回归。结果七百二十一名患者(65%头盔,35%不加密)符合纳入标准。盔甲在研究期间使用加倍(43%至81%,P <0.001),但任何头部损伤的速率都没有显着变化(49%至43%,P = 0.499)。在多变量的回归中,头盔患者患者遭受严重损伤的可能性显着(差距[或],2.01; 95%; 95%置信区间[CI],1.30-3.11),颅内出血(或1.81; 95%CI,1.10-2.96 ),胸部损伤(或1.66; 95%CI,1.05-2.61),和/或腰骶脊柱损伤(或1.84; 95%CI,1.04-3.25)比无绒患者。头盔患者的一半可能患颈椎损伤(或0.51; 95%CI,0.30-0.89)和第三个可能维持颅骨骨折和/或头皮裂解(或0.30; 95%CI,0.14-0.64 )。与那些从雪上倒在雪中的人(分别为70%,P <0.001)时,更多地击中固定物体的患者是头盔。调整后,击中固定物体是损伤机制,最明显与严重损伤相关(或2.80; 95%CI,1.79-4.38)。结论与无与伦比的参与者相比,在I级Trauma中心评估的头盔滑雪者和滑雪板更容易遭受严重损伤,包括颅内出血。然而,它们不太可能维持头骨骨折或颈椎损伤。头盔患者也更有可能击中静止物体。无论头盔使用如何,我们的调查结果都强化了高冲击损伤后安全滑雪实践和创伤评估的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号