首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Impact of a simplified management algorithm on outcome following exsanguinating pelvic fractures: A 10-year experience
【24h】

Impact of a simplified management algorithm on outcome following exsanguinating pelvic fractures: A 10-year experience

机译:简化管理算法对骨盆骨盆骨折后果的影响:10年的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND Optimal management of exsanguinating pelvic fractures remains controversial. Our previous experience suggested that management decisions based on a defined algorithm were associated with a significant reduction in transfusion requirements and mortality. Based on these outcomes, a clinical pathway (PW) for the management of exsanguinating pelvic fractures was developed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of this PW on outcomes. METHODS Consecutive patients over 10 years with blunt pelvic fractures subsequent to the implementation of the clinical PW were identified. Patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures are managed initially with a pelvic orthotic device. For those with continued hemodynamic instability and no extrapelvic source of hemorrhage, pelvic angiography was performed followed by elective pelvic fixation. Patients managed according to the PW were compared with those patients whose management deviated (DEV) from the PW. RESULTS There were 3,467 patients identified. Three hundred twelve (9%) met entry criteria: 246 (79%) comprised the PW group and 66 (21%) the DEV group. Injury severity, as measured by Injury Severity Score (35 vs. 36; p = 0.55), admission Glasgow Coma Scale (10 vs. 10; p = 0.58), admission BE (-7.4 vs. -6.4, p = 0.38), admission SBP (107 vs. 104, p = 0.53), and PRBC requirements during initial resuscitation (6.1 units vs. 6.6 units, p = 0.22) were similar between the groups. Pelvic orthotic device use was 48% in the DEV group (p < 0.001). Twenty-four percent of the PW group required angiography compared with 74% of the DEV group (p < 0.001). Forty-eight-hour transfusions (11 vs. 16, p = 0.01) and mortality (35% vs. 48%, p = 0.04) were reduced in the PW group compared with the DEV group. Pathway adherence was identified as an independent predictor of both decreased transfusions (beta = -5.8, p = 0.002) via multiple linear regression and decreased mortality (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.98) via multivariable cox proportional hazards analysis. CONCLUSION Adherence to a defined clinical PW simplified the management of exsanguinating pelvic fractures and contributed to a reduction in both transfusion requirements and mortality.
机译:外壳骨盆骨折的背景最佳管理仍存在争议。我们以前的经验表明,基于定义算法的管理决策与输血要求和死亡率显着降低相关。基于这些结果,开发了一种临床途径(PW),用于管理骨盆骨盆骨折的管理。本研究的目的是评估该PW对结果的影响。方法鉴定了在实施临床PW的实施之后,连续10岁以上的患者患有钝的骨盆骨折。患有血流动力学不稳定骨盆骨折的患者最初用盆腔矫形器件进行管理。对于那些持续血液动力学不稳定性而没有外出的出血来源,进行盆腔血管造影,然后进行选修盆腔固定。将根据PW管理的患者与那些管理偏离(开发)从PW的患者进行比较。结果鉴定了3,467名患者。三百十二(9%)欧足入境标准:246(79%)包括PW集团,66(21%)开发集团。损伤严重程度,按损伤严重程度评分(35〜36; P = 0.55),入场(10与10; P = 0.58),入场(-7.4 vs. -6.4,P = 0.38),在初始复苏期间(6.1单位与6.6单位,P = 0.22)之间的预备SBP(107对104,P = 0.53)和PRBC要求在组之间相似。 DEV组中的盆腔矫形器件使用48%(P <0.001)。二十四个PW组所需的血管造影与74%的DEV组(P <0.001)。与DEV组相比,PW Group在PW组中减少了408小时的输血(11 vs.16,p = 0.01)和死亡率(35%vs.48%,p = 0.04)。通过多元线性回归和降低死亡率(危险比,0.74; 95%置信区间,0.42-0.98)通过多变量的Cox比例危害分析。结论依赖于定义的临床PW简化了患者骨盆骨折的管理,并导致输血要求和死亡率降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号