首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Comparison of implant stability measurement devices for bone-anchored hearing aid systems
【24h】

Comparison of implant stability measurement devices for bone-anchored hearing aid systems

机译:骨架稳定性测量装置对骨架沉重助听器系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Statement of problem The success of implants for bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) relies on proper osseointegration at the bone-implant interface. Clinical evaluation of implant stability is important in prescribing loading, identifying the risk of failure, and monitoring the long-term health of the implant. Purpose The purpose of this in?vitro study was to evaluate 2 measurement systems for BAHA implant stability: the most commonly used, Osstell implant stability quotient (ISQ), and a newly developed advance system for implant stability testing (ASIST). Material and methods BAHA implants (Oticon Medical Ponto and Cochlear BAHA Connect systems) were installed in plastic materials with adhesive to simulate implants integrated in bone with varying levels of interface stiffness. Different lengths of BAHA abutments were used with each implant specimen, and stability measurements were obtained with both the Osstell ISQ and the ASIST systems. The measurement systems were evaluated in terms of sensitivity to differences in interface stiffness and the effect of abutment length on the stability measurement. Repeated measures ANOVA followed by post hoc t tests were used for the comparisons with a Bonferroni adjusted alpha value of .05/15?= .003 to control for potential type 1 errors. Results Changing the abutment length of a single implant installation had minimal effect on the ASIST stability coefficient, whereas large variations were observed in the Osstell implant stability quotient (ISQ). The Osstell showed a clear relationship of decreasing ISQ with increasing abutment length for both the Oticon Medical and the Cochlear implant systems. Both the ASIST and the Osstell were found to be sensitive to changes in interface properties, with the ASIST being more sensitive to these changes. Conclusions The ASIST system is more sensitive to changes in interface properties and shows smaller variation because of changes in abutment length than the Osstell ISQ system.
机译:摘要问题介绍骨架助听器(巴哈)植入物的成功依赖于骨植入界面的适当骨整合。植入物稳定性的临床评估对于规定装载是重要的,识别失败的风险,并监测植入物的长期健康。目的在玻璃体外研究中的目的是评估2个用于巴哈植入稳定性的测量系统:最常用的osstell植入稳定商(ISQ),以及用于植入物稳定性测试的新开发的先进系统(Asist)。材料和方法Baha植入物(Iticon Medical Ponto和Cochlear Baha Connect Systems)安装在塑料材料中,粘合剂模拟骨骼中集成的植入物,不同程度的界面刚度。与每个植入物标本一起使用不同长度的BAHA支座,用osstell ISQ和ASIST系统获得稳定性测量。根据对界面刚度的敏感性和邻接长度对稳定性测量的影响来评估测量系统。重复措施ANOVA随后是HOC T测试用于与Bonferroni调整后的alpha值的比较.05 / 15?= .003来控制潜在类型1错误。结果改变单个植入物装置的抵靠长度对asist稳定系数的影响最小,而在osstell植入物稳定商(ISQ)中观察到大的变化。 osstell显示出逐渐降低ISQ的明确关系,随着Iticon Medical和Cochlear植入系统的增加。发现asist和osstell都对接口属性的变化敏感,asist对这些变化更敏感。结论Asist系统对界面特性的变化更敏感,并且由于邻接长度的变化而言,变化较小,而不是osstell ISQ系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号