...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences >Emotional Reactivity as a Vulnerability for Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures? Responses While Reliving Specific Emotions.
【24h】

Emotional Reactivity as a Vulnerability for Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures? Responses While Reliving Specific Emotions.

机译:情绪反应性作为心理注意力癫痫发作的脆弱性? 在重温特异性情绪的同时回应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dysfunction in emotional processes is a hypothesized contributor to functional neurological disorders (FNDs), yet few studies have evoked real-time emotion during multimethod assessment incorporating subjective, behavioral, and psychophysiological indicators. This approach may reveal clinical and neurobiological vulnerability to FND and clarify how dysfunctional emotional processes serve as perpetuating factors. Eleven participants with video-EEG-confirmed diagnoses of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) were compared with 49 seizure-free trauma control subjects (TCs) with or without clinically elevated posttraumatic stress symptoms (25 clinically elevated [TC-clin], 24 not clinically elevated [TC-nonclin]). Participants recalled and described memories evoking anger, shame, happiness, and neutral feelings. Even though PNES patients and TCs reported similar amounts of emotional experience, PNES patients reported more difficulty reliving emotions and were less likely to complete the relived shame task. During and after reliving happiness, PNES and TC-clin groups showed respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) decreases, indicating parasympathetic withdrawal, whereas the TC-nonclin group showed RSA increases. Findings from this pilot study are consistent with previous research and clinical observations that emotional engagement may be more effortful for PNES patients. Patterns of RSA change, which may also point to greater effortful engagement, were similar in PNES and TC-clin groups, suggesting that traumatic stress reactions may play a part. At the same time, experience of greater difficulty or avoidance may be even greater among PNES patients. Especially when regulatory resources are already limited, accumulated effort, coupled with self-threatening contexts such as shame, may be particularly problematic for those with PNES and perhaps other FNDs.
机译:情绪过程中的功能障碍是对功能性神经疾病(FNDS)的假设贡献者,但很少有研究在包含主观,行为和心理生理指标的多算法评估期间诱发实时情感。这种方法可以揭示FND的临床和神经生物学脆弱性,并阐明功能失调的情绪过程如何成为延续因素。将具有49个癫痫发作的创伤对照受试者(TCS)进行或没有临床升高的错误应激症状(24临床上临床上的临床升高的癫痫发作癫痫发作(PNES)的119名参与者的心理注意到(PNES)。升高[Tc-nonclin])。参与者召回并描述了记忆唤起了愤怒,羞耻,幸福和中立的感受。尽管潘尼斯患者和TCS报告了类似的情绪体验,但潘尼斯患者报告更多难度的情绪,并且不太可能完成继承的耻辱任务。在重温幸福期间和之后,PNES和TC-CLIN组显示呼吸道窦性心律失常(RSA)降低,表明副交互戒断,而TC-NONCLIN组显示RSA增加。这项试验研究的调查结果与先前的研究和临床观察一致,临床观察表明,情绪啮合可能更加努力对潘纳患者更加努力。 RSA变化的模式也可能指向更高的努力参与,在PNES和TC-Clin组中类似,表明创伤应力反应可能发挥作用。与此同时,在患者中,难度或避免的经验可能更大。特别是当监管资源已经有限时,积累的努力与诸如羞耻等自我威胁的环境相结合,对于那些与PNES的人可能特别有问题,也许是其他FND。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号