...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine >Screening for trisomy 18 using traditional combined screening vs. ultrasound-based protocol in tertiary center environment
【24h】

Screening for trisomy 18 using traditional combined screening vs. ultrasound-based protocol in tertiary center environment

机译:使用传统组合筛选与三级中心环境中的超声协议进行三元18的筛选

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: To compare the screening performances of combined screening test risk algorithm for trisomy 18 (T18) using various cutoffs with a multiparameter ultrasound-based method. To compare the general and maternal age (MA)-based screening performances for T18 by means of combined screening and an ultrasound-based method.Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter study based on a mixed-risk non-selected population of women referred to referral centers for a first-trimester screening. Each subject was offered a choice between either a traditional combined screening (CSG arm) or an ultrasound-based screening (USG arm). General and MA-based screening performances were measured.Results: The study population comprised 10 820 pregnancies as follows: 5132 in the CSG arm, including 28 cases of T18, and 5688 in the USG arm, including 29 cases of T18. In the CSG arm, the detection rate (DR) for T18 at a false-positive rate (FPR) of 3% was 86%, whereas the DR was 100% for the USG arm. MA influenced the T18 screening performance in the CSG arm and reduced the DR in MA ranges <26 years and 31-35 years. This influence was not observed in the USG arm.Conclusions: Only, a multiparameter ultrasound-based screening method may be considered an effective alternative to combined screening for T18 screening. The technique exhibits high and stable DRs irrespective of MA.
机译:目的:使用具有多种基于多游基金的方法的各种截止,比较三术18(T18)组合筛选试验风险算法的筛选性能。通过组合筛查和基于超声的方法比较T18的一般和母体年龄(MA)的筛查表演。方法:这是基于混合风险的未选择妇女妇女的预期,多中心研究前期筛查的推荐中心。每个主题都提供了传统的组合筛选(CSG ARM)或基于超声的筛选(USG ARM)之间的选择。衡量了一般和基于MA的筛查表演。结果:研究人群包含10 820个妊娠,如下所示:5132在CSG ARM中,包括28例T18和USG ARM中的5688例,包括29例T18。在CSG臂中,T18以3%的假阳性率(FPR)的检测率(DR)为86%,而USG臂的DR为100%。 MA影响了CSG臂中的T18筛选性能,并减少了MA范围<26岁和315岁的博士。在USG ARM中未观察到这种影响。仅,仅,基于多游艇计超声波的筛选方法可以被认为是组合用于T18筛选的有效替代方案。该技术表现出高且稳定的DRS,无论MA如何。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号