首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Revision for recurrent instability: what are the predictors of failure?
【24h】

Revision for recurrent instability: what are the predictors of failure?

机译:修订反复不稳定:失败的预测因子是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Dislocation is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we evaluated treatment strategies in patients undergoing revision THA for instability. A total of 156 hips in 154 patients underwent revision THA for instability between 2000 and 2007 at our institution. Demographic data and surgical treatment used were analyzed to determine risk factors for failure. Revision treatments included acetabular components in 100 hips, liner exchange in 56 hips, and femoral and acetabular components in 13 hips. Thirty-three (21.2%) had further dislocation. Isolated liner revision (P = .004), previous revision arthroplasty (P < .05), and the use of a 28-mm femoral head were associated with higher failure rates. A total of 20.3% (12/59) of constrained liners failed. Isolated liner exchange, history of revision, and use of a 28-mm head were associated with failure in revision THA for instability.
机译:脱位是髋关节关节成形术(THA)后的常见并发症。 在这项研究中,我们评估了经受不稳定进行修改的患者的治疗策略。 154名患者共有156髋在我们所在机构的2000年至2007年期间进行修订。 使用人口统计数据和手术治疗,以确定失败的风险因素。 修复治疗包括在100髋的100髋,衬里交换中包含髋臼组分,13个臀部的股骨和髋臼组分。 三十三(21.2%)进一步错位。 孤立的衬垫修订(P = .004),先前的修正关节造身术(P <.05),使用28毫米股头的使用与更高的失效率相关。 共有20.3%(12/59)约束衬里失败。 孤立的衬垫交换,修订史以及28毫米头的使用与修订版的失败有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号