...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of heart and lung transplantation: the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation >Intraoperative extracorporeal support during lung transplantation in patients bridged with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
【24h】

Intraoperative extracorporeal support during lung transplantation in patients bridged with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

机译:腹腔移植术治疗桥接术术治疗的肺部移植术治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUNDVenovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is the preferred configuration for bridging respiratory failure patients while awaiting lung transplantation. However, there is no consensus on intraoperative extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support during lung transplantation in these patients. METHODSThe configuration of the intraoperative extracorporeal circuit after VV ECMO bridge was reviewed and correlated with clinical outcomes. This retrospective cohort study performed at our university hospital included 34 patients who were successfully bridged solely with VV ECMO to lung transplantation during the period 2007 to 2016. Indications to switch to intraoperative venoarterial (VA) ECMO were hemodynamic compromise (systemic hypotension or mean pulmonary artery pressure >40 mm Hg) or when this scenario was thought to be highly likely. RESULTSThe median duration of bridging was 12 (IQR 7 to 19) days. Intraoperatively, 3 patients (8.8%) required cardiopulmonary bypass. Twenty patients (58.8%) stayed on VV ECMO and 11 (32.3%) were switched to central VA ECMO. Between the 2 types of intraoperative ECMO (VV vs VA), there were no significant differences in post-operative ECMO duration, chest reopening for bleeding, or renal replacement therapy. There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality (0% and 9.0%,p?=?0.35) or in long-term survival (p?=?0.59). The intraoperative transfusion of red blood cells tended to be higher in the VA group (5 [4 to 9] vs 8 [6 to 13] units,p?=?0.06). Use of intraoperative VA ECMO was associated with the use of low-flow VV device bridging and lobar transplantation. CONCLUSIONSUsing the existing VV ECMO bridge intraoperatively during lung transplantation is feasible and provides comparable outcomes to patients converted to central VA ECMO for compromised hemodynamics.
机译:背景Vencoone(VV)体外膜氧合(ECMO)是在等待肺移植的同时桥接呼吸衰竭患者的优选构造。然而,在这些患者的肺移植过程中没有达成共识。综述VV Ecmo桥后术中体外电路的方法的配置与临床结果相关。在我们的大学医院进行的这项回顾性队列研究包括34名患者,该患者仅在2007年至2016年期间与VV Ecmo成功地桥接到肺移植。转向术中静脉(VA)ECMO的适应症是血流动力学妥协(全身低血压或平均肺动脉压力> 40 mm hg)或认为这一情景很可能。结果桥梁的中位数是12天(IQR 7至19)天。术中,3名患者(8.8%)所需的心肺旁路。 20名患者(58.8%)留在VV ECMO和11(32.3%)上切换到中央VA ECMO。在2种类型的术中ECMO(VV VS VA)之间,术后ECMO持续时间没有显着差异,胸部重新开放,或肾置换疗法。 90天死亡率(0%和9.0%,P?= 0.35)或长期存活(P?= 0.59)没有显着差异。在VA组中,红细胞的术中输注趋于更高(5 [4至9] vs 8 [6至13]单位,p?= 0.06)。使用术中VA ECMO与使用低流量VV器件桥接和叶片移植有关。结论肺移植术中现有的VV ECMO大桥是可行的,可与转化为血流动力学的患者转化为血流动力学的患者的可比较结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号