...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Forestry Review >Global deforestation patterns: comparing recent and past forest loss processes through a spatially explicit analysis
【24h】

Global deforestation patterns: comparing recent and past forest loss processes through a spatially explicit analysis

机译:全球森林砍伐模式:通过空间显式分析比较近期和过去的森林损失过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study explores how deforestation relates to biophysical and socio-economic variables in a quantitative, spatially explicit analysis. Both patterns of historical (approximately 4000 B.C. -2000 A. D.) and recent (1990-2005) deforestation were explored and compared. The study uses location analysis, combining spatially explicit global databases of deforestation with variables hypothesized to relate to deforestation (e.g. rural livestock density, cost-distance). The results show that historical and recent deforestation show similar patterns when plotted against the selected variables suggesting the relations to be empirical. The strongest relations were between deforestation and rural population density, cost-distance and crop suitability respectively. These findings support the hypothesis that agricultural expansion was the largest direct cause of deforestation historically and it continues to be the largest direct cause today. While crop suitability showed a strong correlation with deforestation, pasture suitability showed no correlation. The study accordingly compares contemporary deforestation in the tropical domain against economic development (approximated by a combination of GDP value and growth rate) which resulted in a reproduction of the deforestation pattern predicted by the forest transition curve. In view of the apparent empirical relation, the variables which relate to deforestation in this study are expected to have predictive power to identify locations of likely future deforestation. To illustrate the application value of this analysis, the deforestation risk in African protected forest was assessed. This assessment revealed that protected areas are found on locations with below average pressure and the pressures vary greatly in the different regions. The findings underline the importance of considering national circumstances to understand the government's efforts to manage its forests sustainably and contribute to international mitigation by reducing forest-related emissions.
机译:本研究探讨了森林殖民如何涉及在定量的空间明确分析中的生物物理和社会经济变量。历史(约4000公里 - -2000 A. D.)和最近(1990-2005)森林砍伐的两种模式都被探讨并比较了。该研究使用定位分析,将空间明确的全球数据库与假设的变量相结合,以涉及森林砍伐(例如农村牲畜密度,成本距离)。结果表明,历史和最近的森林砍伐术时绘制了类似模式,当绘制了所选择的变量,表明关系是经验的。最强的关系分别在森林砍伐和农村人口密度,成本距离和作物适应性之间。这些调查结果支持农业扩张是历史上最大的森林砍伐直接原因的假设,它仍然是今天最大的直接原因。虽然作物适用性与砍伐森林术语表现出强烈的相关性,但牧场适用性显示没有相关性。因此,研究相应地将热带域中的当代森林砍伐与经济发展(通过GDP值和生长速率的组合近似),这导致森林转换曲线预测的森林殖民地模式的再现。鉴于明显的实证关系,预计涉及本研究中的砍伐森林的变量将具有预测的力量,以确定可能未来森林砍伐的位置。为了说明该分析的应用价值,评估了非洲保护林中的森林森林风险。该评估显示,在低于平均压力的地点,压力在不同地区有很大差异。调查结果强调了考虑国家环境,了解政府努力通过减少与森林有关的排放来管理其森林的努力,并促进国际减缓。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号