首页> 外文期刊>The International Forestry Review >The governance of global forest statistics: case study on forest products trade between Sub-Saharan Africa and China
【24h】

The governance of global forest statistics: case study on forest products trade between Sub-Saharan Africa and China

机译:全球森林统计的治理 - 撒哈拉非洲和中国林产品贸易案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

What drives discrepancies and inconsistencies in global forest statistics? The use of global statistics has influenced academic research and sectoral policies of forest ecosystems since the first global forest assessment was conducted in 1948 or even earlier. Very little work has beendone to provide a comprehensive analysis of the governance structure and the quality of predominant international forest databases. Furthermore, very little is known about the attractiveness and/or repulsiveness of global forest statistics platforms to scholars, policy-makers and other users.To reduce knowledge gap, this article examines the governance structure and strategies of three major databases which provide data on global forest products trade including timber export/import flows data, namely FAOSTAT, the United Nations Comtrade, and Chatham House's Resource Trade Earth.This paper uses conceptual and theoretical frameworks of data governance and nudge theories are used to study the production, quality, attractiveness and repulsiveness of global forest statistics and the related platforms through research on a qualitative and quantitative methodological approach.The main findings show that among the above three data platforms, only Comtrade received first-hand data directly from UN producing member states' offices, while the other organisations depend on Comtrade, transform second-hand data. More importantly, the article reveals thatthe levels of quality and attractiveness of the forest databases in our study are unequal and that database attractiveness is not based on quality. As a result, global forest statistics providers may be motivated to put more effort into improving database attractiveness rather than quality,which is more challenging. Consequently, it is likely that the governance structure and strategies reported in these databases can substantially affect the reliability of numbers used in academic research and policy-decisions since they are generated from the related global forest statistics.
机译:什么推动了全球森林统计数据的差异和不一致?自1948年甚至更早的全球森林评估以来,使用全球统计数据影响了森林生态系统的学术研究和部门政策。很少的工作已经倾向于对治理结构和主要的国际森林数据库的质量提供全面的分析。此外,关于全球森林统计平台对学者,政策制定者和其他用户的吸引力和/或斥力的知名度很少。为了减少知识缺口,本文审查了三个主要数据库的治理结构和战略,提供全球数据林产品贸易包括木材出口/导入流动数据,即粮农组织拓,联合国康斯特拉德和查塔姆屋的资源交易地球。本文采用概念和理论框架的数据治理和技术框架,用于研究生产,质量,吸引力和通过研究全球森林统计和相关平台的斥责通过研究定性和定量方法论方法。主要研究结果表明,在上述三个数据平台中,只有愿意从联合国生产成员国的办公室直接收到一手数据,而另一个组织依赖于COMTRADE,转换二手数据。更重要的是,文章揭示了我们研究中森林数据库的质量和吸引力水平不平等,数据库吸引力不是基于质量。因此,全球森林统计提供商可能有动力,以提高提高数据库吸引力而不是质量,这更具挑战性。因此,在这些数据库中报告的治理结构和策略可能会显着影响学术研究和政策决策中使用的数字的可靠性,因为它们是从相关的全球森林统计数据产生的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号