...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of alternative and complementary medicine: research on paradigm, practice, and policy >Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tanreqing Injection for Pulmonary Infection in Patients with Tuberculosis: A Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tanreqing Injection for Pulmonary Infection in Patients with Tuberculosis: A Meta-Analysis

机译:Tanreqing注射液对结核病患者肺部感染的临床疗效和安全性:META分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Tanreqing injection (TRQ) is often used in the treatment of pulmonary infection in patients with tuberculosis (TB). But its efficacy and safety are still unclear; to further reveal its efficacy and safety, the authors systematically evaluated all relevant trials. Methods: The authors searched published trials using the search strategy as (Tanreqing OR Tanreqing injection) AND (Tuberculosis [MeSH] OR Tuberculosis OR TB) in Embase, PubMed, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Database, CBM and CENTRAL, and ongoing trials in Chinese and U.S. clinical trials and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO-ICTRP) (established to January 2017). The authors evaluated the methodological bias risk of all included trials using the Cochrane evaluation handbook of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (5.1.0), extracted data following the PICO principles, and synthesized the data using meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-six RCTs involving 2404 patients were included. In TRQ alone versus antibiotics, the merged risk ratio (RR) values and their confidence interval (95% CI) of meta-analysis for overall efficacy, lesion absorption, and bacterial clearance were as follows: 1.05 (0.99-1.10), 0.98 (0.89-1.08), and 1.36 (1.09-1.70). All differences were not statistically significant. In TRQ plus antibiotics versus antibiotics, the RR values and their 95% CI of overall efficacy, lesion absorption, and bacterial clearance were as follows: 1.17 (1.10-1.25), 1.24 (1.11-1.38), and 1.61 (1.36-1.90). All differences were statistically significant. Except for the bacterial clearance, sensitivity analyses showed that the overall efficacy had good stability. Conclusions: TRQ may have the same overall efficacy as antibiotics in pulmonary infection in patients with TB. TRQ plus antibiotics may improve the clinical efficacy. TRQ may have synergistic effect to antibiotics through bacteriostatic activity and eliminating inflammatory mediators. Its antibacterial activity may be better than some antibiotics and does not increase adverse drug reaction. But all these need new evidences for further investigation.
机译:背景:Tanreqing注射液(TRQ)通常用于治疗结核病患者肺部感染(TB)。但它的功效和安全仍然不清楚;为了进一步揭示其疗效和安全性,作者系统地评估了所有相关试验。方法:作者在Embase,Pubmed,CNKI,VIP,WANFANG数据库,CBM和中央,康复数据库,CBM和中央,康复数据库,CBM和中央,康复数据库,CBM和中央结核病或结核病或结核病或结核病)和(结核病[网格]或结核病或TB)搜索了已发布的试验。和美国临床试验和世界卫生组织国际临床试验登记平台(WHO-ICTRP)(成立于2017年1月)。作者评估了使用随机对照试验(RCT)的Cochrane评估手册(5.1.0),提取了微微原理提取的数据,并使用META分析合成数据。结果:涉及2404名患者的二十六个RCT。在TRQ单独与抗生素,合并的风险比(RR)值及其置信区间(RR)值及其置信区间(95%CI)对整体疗效,病变吸收和细菌间隙进行了如下:1.05(0.99-1.10),0.98( 0.89-1.08),1.36(1.09-1.70)。所有差异都没有统计学意义。在TRQ Plus抗生素与抗生素相比,RR值及其95%的整体疗效,病变吸收和细菌间隙如下:1.17(1.10-1.25),1.24(1.11-1.38)和1.61(1.36-1.90) 。所有差异均有统计学意义。除了细菌间隙外,敏感性分析表明,整体疗效具有良好的稳定性。结论:TRQ可具有与TB患者肺部感染中抗生素相同的整体疗效。 TRQ Plus抗生素可以提高临床疗效。 TRQ可通过抑菌活动和消除炎症介质对抗生素具有协同效应。其抗菌活性可能比某种抗生素更好,并且不会增加不良药物反应。但所有这些都需要进一步调查的新证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号