...
首页> 外文期刊>The Indian Journal of Agronomy >Economics and yield response in rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system as influenced by different tillage and sowing methods inEastern Region
【24h】

Economics and yield response in rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system as influenced by different tillage and sowing methods inEastern Region

机译:水稻(Oryza Sativa) - 沐浴灭鼠方法的耕种(Triticum aestivum)作物系统的经济学和产量应答

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A field experiment was carried out during the rainy (kharif) and winter (rabi) seasons of 2011 to 2014 at ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar to evaluate the performance of rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L) croppingsystem under different tillage practices and sowing methods with economics. Four methods of sowing in rice, viz. zero-tilled rice (ZT), wet sowing through drum seeder, unpuddled mechanical transplanted rice (UT) and puddled transplanting (CT); whereas in wheat 3 methods of sowings, viz. zero-till-sowing (ZT), manual line sowing (CT) and sowing with Turbo Happy seeder (HS), were evaluated and compared. Unpuddled mechanical transplanting of rice followed by manual sowing of wheat recorded the least bulkdensity (1.52 Mg/m3), which was statistically at par with puddled transplanting of rice followed by zero/reduced tilled wheat (1.55 Mg/m3). The CT-HS and CT-ZT practice under rice-wheat cropping system showed higher water-holding capacity (42.34%), meanweight diameter (0.943 mm), water-stable aggregates (32.45%) and higher hydraulic conductivity (3.05 mm/ hr) over ZT-ZT and CT-CT practice at 0-15 cm of soil depth. Grain yield of conventionally transplanted rice (4.56 t/ha) was statistically at par withunpuddled mechanical transplanted rice, however the highest output: input ratio of 2.4 was recorded in unpuddled mechanically transplanted rice. Wheat grown in plots of manually transplanted rice and mechanical transplanted rice, gave significantly higher yield, i.e. 4.54 and 4.4 t/ ha, with an output: input ratio of 2.1 and 2.2 respectively. Wheat sown by Turbo Happy seeder gave significantly higher grain yield (4.38 t/ha) over other methods of sowing. Zero-tilled rice and mechanically transplanted rice saved 81.6 and 72.3% of sowing cost and 97.3 and 95.6% in terms of time taken in sowing/transplanting on hectare basis respectively. Sowing of wheat through zero-till-drill and Turbo Happy Seeder economized the overall cost of cultivation by 9,800 and9,110/ha respectively along with 10-12 days earliness in sowing of wheat after harvesting of rice crop. In terms of system productivity, CT-HS and UT-HS practices provided the maximum productivity with higher benefit: cost ratio. From soil health and yield point of view, zero/reduced tillage followed by conventional tillage or conventional tillage followed by zero/reduced tillage in rice-wheat system (CT-ZT scenario) was found most promising tillage practice.
机译:在2011年至2014年的近日(kharif)和冬季(Rabi)Seasons在东部地区,帕特纳,比哈尔娜,比哈尔娜,比哈尔娜的冬季(Rabi)季节进行了一个田间实验,以评估米饭(Oryza Sativa L.) - 小麦(Triticum aestivum l)不同耕作实践和播种方法的裁剪系统。四种播种方法米,张。零耕米(ZT),湿播通过滚筒播种机,无水冲突的机械移植米(UT)和挤液移植(CT);虽然小麦3种播种方法,viz。评估零直到播种(ZT),手动线播种(CT)和用涡轮播种机(HS)播种,并比较。稻米的机械移植绝对播种,随后记录了小麦的播种(1.52mg / m3),其统计学地与水稻水粉泥浆移植术称为零/减少耕种小麦(1.55mg / m 3)。稻米种植系统下的CT-HS和CT-ZT实践显示出较高的水储存能力(42.34%),平易直径(0.943mm),水稳定的聚集体(32.45%)和更高的液压导电性(3.05 mm / hr )通过ZT-ZT和CT-CT实践在0-15厘米的土壤深度。常规移植的水稻(4.56 T / HA)的颗粒产量在胰粥样机械移植的水稻中统计学上,但最高输出:2.4的输入比记录在没有缓冲的机械移植的水稻中。小麦在手动移植的水稻和机械移植水稻的图中生长,得到了显着提高产量,即4.54和4.4吨/公顷,输出:输入比为2.1和2.2。涡轮播种播种机播种的小麦在播种的其他方法上给出了显着提高的谷物产量(4.38吨/公顷)。零耕稻和机械移植的水稻在播种/移植的基础上分别播种/移植的时间方面保存了81.6和72.3%,97.3%和95.6%。通过零钻头和涡轮播种播种机播种,播种机分别在收获稻米作物后播种小麦的10-12天,以9,800和9,110 / ha的整体培养成本。在系统生产率方面,CT-HS和UT-HS实践提供了具有更高益处的最大生产率:成本比率。从土壤健康和产量的观点来看,零/降低耕作,随后是常规耕作或常规耕作,然后在大米 - 小麦系统(CT-ZT场景)中零/降低的耕作中最有希望的耕作实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号