...
首页> 外文期刊>The Indian Journal of Agronomy >Participatory evaluation of choice and combination of enterprises for integrated farming system under dry-land and irrigated agro-ecosystems
【24h】

Participatory evaluation of choice and combination of enterprises for integrated farming system under dry-land and irrigated agro-ecosystems

机译:干旱灌溉农业生态系统综合养殖系统选择与结合的参与性评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Krishi Vigyan Kendra Sutur, Mysore, has developed 6 integrated farming system (IFS models), 3 each under dryland and irrigated farming situations, between 2012 and 2015. The models were analyzed using case-study approach to draw principles of enterprise combination. The average number of enterprizes for 3 dryland models, sericulture, horticulture and cotton (Gossypium sp.)- based IFS, during base year and after 3 years was 3 and 13, respectively; it was 6 and 14, respectively, for the 3 irrigatedmodels, organic horticulture, sericulture and agro-forestry-based IFS. The maximum annual net incomes under dryland in the base year were from agriculture (49,600/ha), coconut (Cocos nucifera L) (^39,800) and sericulture (16,700/ha); after 3 years, theorder changed to coconut (46,000), sericulture (30,900) and agriculture (16,600). Under irrigated condition higher net returns in the base year came from coconut (^94,000/ha), horticulture (42,300/ha) and vegetables 40,000/ ha), which changed after 3 years to coconut (^1,34,500/ha), sericulture (81,400/ha) and silviculture (77,600/ ha). However, the maximum benefit: cost ratio under dry farming was from forage crops and goat/sheep rearing followed by vermicomposting, implying short-duration low-investment enterprises complemented the core enterprizes, coconut and sericulture. On the contrary, under irrigated farming system, the maximum profitability was in silviculture, coconut and goat/sheep rearing, indicating long-duration enterprises acting as supplementary enterprizes offered better returns. The results revealed that the choice of enterprises, their combination and contribution to the improvement of system productivity differed for dryland and irrigated farming systems but IFS enabled the systemsmore productive, profitable and sustainable under both the situations.
机译:Mysore Krishi Vigyan Kendra Sutur已经开发出6个综合农业系统(IFS模型),3次综合农业系统(IFS型号),在2012年和2015年之间灌溉农业情况。使用案例研究方法来绘制企业组合原则的模型。 3个旱地模型,养蚕,园艺和棉花(Gossypium sp.)的平均企业数量分别为3年和13岁的基于基于基于基于基于基础的Ifs,分别为3和13;它分别为3次灌溉模型,有机园艺,蚕丁和基于农业林业的灌木丛。基准年度旱地的最高年度净收入来自农业(49,600 /公顷),椰子(Cocos Nucifera L)(^ 39,800)和养育(16,700 /公顷); 3年后,当时的椰子(46,000),蚕桑(30,900)和农业(16,600)。根据灌溉条件,基准年的净回报来自椰子(^ 94,000 / ha),园艺(42,300 / ha)和蔬菜40,000 / ha),在3年后改变椰子(^ 1,34,500 / ha),蚕桑(81,400 / ha)和造林(77,600 / ha)。然而,最大益处:干旱养殖下的成本比来自牧群作物和山羊/羊饲养,然后是蠕动,暗示短期低投资企业补充了核心的企业,椰子和蚕豆。相反,在灌溉养殖系统下,最大的盈利能力在造林中,椰子和山羊/绵羊饲养,表明持久企业作为补充企业提供更好的回报。结果表明,企业的选择,它们的组合和对系统生产率的提高贡献不同,对于旱地和灌溉农业系统而言不同,但如果可以在这种情况下使系统更具生产力,有利可图和可持续的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号