...
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Social Psychology >Comparing social group identifications and socioeconomic deprivation as predictors of psychological distress: Evidence from a Scottish primary care sample
【24h】

Comparing social group identifications and socioeconomic deprivation as predictors of psychological distress: Evidence from a Scottish primary care sample

机译:将社会群体识别与社会经济剥夺与心理困扰预测因子进行比较:来自苏格兰初级保健样本的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Social group identification and socioeconomic deprivation have both been linked to self-reported depressive symptoms in general population samples; however, no study to date has explored the strength of the joint predictive value of these factors within a mental health population. The current study explored the impact of social group identifications and socioeconomic deprivation, together with important clinical and demographic variables, on psychological distress in a Scottish mental health sample. Participants (N=976) were recruited from referrals to a computerized cognitive behavioural therapy (cCBT) programme in Scotland, Beating the Blues' (BtB) over a 25-month period. Participants completed the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) as a measure of psychological distress and three versions of the group identifications scale (GIS), one for each of three groups: family, community, and a social group of choice. Demographic information and clinical information were collected on commencing BtB. Higher numbers of group identifications were significantly associated with lower psychological distress. Additionally, increased socioeconomic deprivation was significantly associated with more severe psychological distress; however, interestingly, the association was not as strong as that of group identifications. Identifying with fewer social groups predicts more severe psychological symptom presentations, even more so than living in a greater state of socioeconomic deprivation.
机译:社会群体识别和社会经济剥夺两者都与一般人群样本中的自我报告的抑郁症状有关;但是,迄今为止没有研究过探索了这些因素在心理健康状况中的联合预测价值的力量。目前的研究探讨了社会群体识别和社会经济剥夺的影响,以及重要的临床和人口变量,对苏格兰心理健康样本的心理困扰。参与者(n = 976)被招募到苏格兰的计算机化认知行为治疗(CCBT)计划,在25个月内击败蓝调(BTB)。参与者在常规评估结果措施(Core-OM)中完成了临床结果,作为心理困扰的衡量标识规模(GIS),一个三组:家庭,社区和社会选择。在开始BTB时收集了人口统计信息和临床信息。较少数量的群体鉴定与较低的心理困扰有显着相关。此外,增加的社会经济剥夺与更严重的心理困扰有显着相关;然而,有趣的是,协会并不像集团识别一样强烈。识别较少的社会群体预测更严重的心理症状演示,比生活在更大的社会经济剥夺状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号