...
首页> 外文期刊>The breast journal >A Bio‐Psychosocial Intervention Program for Improving Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors – Final Outcome of a Prospective Randomized Trial
【24h】

A Bio‐Psychosocial Intervention Program for Improving Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors – Final Outcome of a Prospective Randomized Trial

机译:一种改善乳腺癌幸存者的生活质量的生物社会情绪干预计划 - 预期随机试验的最终结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Given the 3.1 million breast cancer survivors in America, quality of life (QoL) is a vital issue. Bio‐psychosocial milieu of survivorship is increasingly important. This study assesses the impact of Bio‐psychosocial Intervention ( BPSI ) on the QoL of breast cancer survivors utilizing Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast ( FACT ‐B) instrument. A prospective randomized trial was designed; intervention arm included a 4‐hour BPSI coping skills class; control arm received standard of cancer and follow‐up care ( SOC ). Women diagnosed within 2 years of study initiation were eligible. Sample size was based on 8‐point difference in FACT ‐B score, 90% power, 5% type I error, and 20% attrition. FACT ‐B questionnaire was administered to all patients at baseline and at 6‐month intervals. SAS 9.3 software was used to analyze data using Chi‐square test for categorical and Wilcoxon rank sum for ordinal data; linear mixed modeling was used for longitudinal analysis. One‐hundred and three of 120 (86%) patients were available for analysis. Forty‐seven patients were in BSPI arm, and 56 received SOC . For BPSI arm versus SOC arm, the median (interquartile) age (60 [52.68] versus 58 [52.68] years, p = 0.9135), cancer‐stage (0:1:2:3 = 11%:41%:35%:13% versus 18%:46%:22%:15%, p = 0.4645), and biology ( ER +:triple negative: HER 2+ = 74%:9%:16% versus 72%:7%:20%, p = 0.8454), respectively, was similar. Median (25th to 75th centile) FACT ‐B scores in BPSI versus SOC arms at baseline were 109 (95.121) versus 112 (95, 122) (p = 0.6125); mean ( SE ) change since baseline at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was: 7.42 (2.22) versus 7.04 (1.97) (p = 0.8862); 17.0 (2.64) versus ?6.09 (2.37) (p 0.0001); 16.03 (2.53) versus 3.58 (2.29) (p = 0.0004), and 15.48 (1.89) versus 16.4 (1.71) (p = 0.7966), respectively. The inter‐group differences remained after adjusting for confounding variables at baseline. The p‐value for interaction among groups over 2 years remained 0.0001 except for breast cancer specific concerns. BPSI coping skills class significantly improved the QoL of breast cancer survivors by 1 year post‐intervention time point; this difference narrowed at 18 months and disappeared at 24 months.
机译:摘要鉴于美国的310万乳腺癌幸存者,生活质量(QOL)是一个重要的问题。生存生存的生物心理社会环境越来越重要。本研究评估生物心理期干预(BPSI)对利用癌症治疗功能评估的乳腺癌幸存者QoL的影响 - 乳房(FACT -B)仪器。设计了一个预期的随机试验;干预武器包括4小时的BPSI应对技能课程;控制臂接受了癌症和后续护理的标准(SOC)。在2年内诊断的妇女均符合条件。样品大小基于8点差,实际上-B得分,90%的功率,5%I型误差,20%的磨损。事实-b调查问卷由基线和6个月间隔的所有患者施用。 SAS 9.3软件用于使用Chi-Square测试对序数数据的分类和Wilcoxon等级使用Chi-Square测试进行分析数据;线性混合建模用于纵向分析。 120中的120例(86%)患者可用于分析。四十七名患者在BSPI ARM中,56名获得SoC。对于BPSI ARM与SOC ARM,中位数(四分位数)年龄(60 [52.68]与58 [52.68]岁,P = 0.9135),癌症阶段(0:1:2:3 = 11%:41%:35% :13%对18%:46%:22%:15%,p = 0.4645),生物学(ER +:三重阴性:她的2+ = 74%:9%:16%与72%:7%:20 %,p = 0.8454)分别是相似的。 BPSI中的中位数(第25至第75至第25至第75升中心)FACT -B分数在基线时,BPSI与SOC臂的分数为109(95.121),而112(95,122)(P = 0.6125);由于6,12,18和24个月的基线,因此平均值(SE)变化是:7.42(2.22)与7.04(1.97)(P = 0.8862); 17.0(2.64)与?6.09(2.37)(P <0.0001); 16.03(2.53)与3.58(2.29)(P = 0.0004)和15.48(1.89)分别为16.4(1.71)(P = 0.7966)。在基线上调整混淆变量后,群体间差异仍然存在。除了乳腺癌特异性外,剩余2年超过2年的群体之间的相互作用的p值仍然存在。 BPSI应对技能阶级明显改善乳腺癌幸存者的QoL后1年后的干预后的时间点;这种差异在18个月内缩小并在24个月内消失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号