首页> 外文期刊>The Breast : >A standard mastectomy should not be the only recommended breast surgical treatment for non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer: A large population-based study in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database 18
【24h】

A standard mastectomy should not be the only recommended breast surgical treatment for non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer: A large population-based study in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database 18

机译:标准的乳房切除术不应该是非转移性炎症乳腺癌的唯一推荐的乳房手术治疗:在监测,流行病学和最终结果数据库18中的大量基于人口的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Standard mastectomy has long been the recommended breast surgical treatment for non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). The objective of this population-based study was to evaluate the significance of various breast surgical treatments for this highly aggressive subtype. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program registry was searched to identify women with non-metastatic IBC receiving standard treatment including breast surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy diagnosed between 1998 and 2013. Comparisons of the proportions of various breast surgery procedures over the years were performed using Pearson's chi-square test. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method and compared across groups using the log-rank statistic. Cox models were then fitted to compare the association between various breast surgical procedures and BCSS or OS after adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics. Results A total of 3374 cases were identified. Over the years, the proportion of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), breast reconstruction and both were increasing. The proportion of implant-based reconstruction was also increasing with no difference in survival compared with other types of reconstruction. There was no statistically significant difference in BCSS or OS among various breast surgery treatments, such as breast conserving surgery, CPM, breast reconstruction and standard unilateral mastectomy. Conclusions Breast surgery is of great significance to the clinical outcome of IBC. Standard mastectomy should not be the only recommended breast surgical treatment. Highlights ? Breast surgery is of great significance to the clinical outcome of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). ? Over the years, an increased rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), breast reconstruction and both was observed. ? The rate of implant-based reconstruction was increasing with no difference in survival compared with other types of reconstruction procedure. ? There was no statistically significant difference in BCSS or OS among various breast surgerical treatments. ? Individualized surgical procedures can be safely performed in non-metastatic IBC patients based on the response of NAC and patients' preference. ]]>
机译:摘要背景标准乳房切除术长期以来一直是非转移性炎症乳腺癌(IBC)的推荐乳房手术治疗。基于人群的研究的目的是评估各种乳腺手术治疗这种高度侵袭性亚型的重要性。方法检测监测,流行病学和最终结果方案登记处,鉴定患有非转移性IBC接受标准治疗的妇女,包括乳房手术,放射治疗和1998年代之间的化疗。多年来各种乳房手术程序的比较比较使用Pearson的Chi-Square测试进行。使用Kaplan-Meier产品限制方法估计乳腺癌特异性存活(BCS)和总存活(OS),并使用日志秩统计进行比较。然后拟合Cox模型以在调整患者和肿瘤特征后进行各种乳房外科手术和BCSS或OS之间的关联。结果共鉴定了3374例。多年来,对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM),乳腺重建和两者的比例正在增加。与其他类型的重建相比,植入物重建的比例也在增加,并且存活率没有差异。在各种乳房手术治疗中,BCSS或OS中没有统计学显着差异,例如乳房保守手术,CPM,乳房重建和标准单侧乳房切除术。结论乳房手术对IBC的临床结果具有重要意义。标准乳房切除术不应该是唯一推荐的乳房手术治疗。强调 ?乳腺手术对炎症乳腺癌(IBC)的临床结果具有重要意义。还多年来,观察到对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM),乳腺重建和两者的增加。还与其他类型的重建程序相比,植入物重建率没有生存差异。还在各种乳房手术治疗中,BCSS或OS中没有统计学显着差异。还基于NAC和患者偏好的反应,可以在非转移性IBC患者中安全地进行个性化的手术程序。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号