...
首页> 外文期刊>The American surgeon. >Management of Appendicitis with the Implementation of an Acute Care Surgery Service in a Community Teaching Hospital
【24h】

Management of Appendicitis with the Implementation of an Acute Care Surgery Service in a Community Teaching Hospital

机译:在社区教学医院实施急性护理外科服务的阑尾炎

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Appendicitis remains one of the most common conditions requiring emergency general surgery intervention. Previous studies have assessed the utility of acute care surgery (ACS) teams for the management of emergency general surgery at the university level. This study compares outcomes for acute appendicitis in a traditional on-call (TOC) model with private practice general surgeon coverage versus an ACS model, using these same general surgeons in a community teaching hospital. We performed a retrospective review of 3254 patients treated for acute appendicitis from 2006 to 2014, during which time, an ACS model was implemented. The primary outcome is length of stay. Secondary outcomes include time interval from case posting to entering operating room, operative time, procedure performed, and complications. This study demonstrates significant decreases in time intervals including a shorter length of stay (median 22.8 vs 27.9 hours, P < 0.001), shorter time to start surgery (median 1.5 vs 1.6 hours, P 4 0.02 if request start within 2 hours; median 2.5 vs 3.0 hours, P 4 0.04 if request start within 4 hours), and shorter operative time (median 40 vs 46 min, P < 0.001). Both cohorts were most likely to perform a laparoscopic intervention, but the ACS group was less likely to convert to an open procedure (4 vs 5%, P < 0.001), and the rate of complications was similar in both groups (5 vs 7%, P 4 0.07). Overall, this study shows that an ACS model can expedite care and provide high-quality care, with equivalent outcomes, when compared with a traditional on-call model in a community hospital with private practice general surgeons.. ^e>mfarrellmd@gmail.com
机译:阑尾炎仍然是需要紧急普通手术干预的最常见条件之一。以前的研究已经评估了急性护理手术(ACS)团队在大学级别管理应急普通手术的效用。本研究比较了传统的呼叫(TOC)模型中急性阑尾炎的结果,私人实践普通外科医生与ACS模型,在社区教学医院中使用相同的一般外科医生。我们对2006年至2014年对急性阑尾炎治疗的3254名患者进行了回顾性综述,在此期间,实施了ACS模型。主要结果是逗留时间。二次结果包括从案例发布到进入手术室,手术时间,执行的程序和并发症的时间间隔。本研究表明,时间间隔的显着降低,包括较短的逗留时间(中位数22.8 vs 27.9小时,P <0.001),开始手术的时间较短(中位数1.5 Vs 1.6小时,如果请求在2小时内开始,则为0.02;中位数2.5 vs 3.0小时,p 4 0.04如果请求在4小时内开始),较短的操作时间(中位数40 vs 46 min,p <0.001)。两个队列最有可能进行腹腔镜介入,但ACS组不太可能转化为开放程序(4 vs 5%,P <0.001),两组中的并发症率相似(5 vs 7% ,p 4 0.07)。总体而言,这项研究表明,与私人实践普通外科医生的社区医院中的传统接头模型相比,ACS模型可以加快护理并提供高质量的护理,并提供相当的结果。^ e> mfarrellmd @ gmail。 com

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号