首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Surgery >Advancement in the quality of operative documentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of synoptic versus narrative operative reporting
【24h】

Advancement in the quality of operative documentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of synoptic versus narrative operative reporting

机译:操作文献质量的进步:Synoptic与叙事手术报告的系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The operative report is vital for patients and central to surgical quality assessment. Narrative operative reports are often poor quality. Synoptic reporting can improve documentation. The objective was to identify and appraise studies comparing synoptic and narrative operative reporting.
机译:背景:手术报告对患者至关重要,对手术质量评估至关重要。 叙事手术报告通常很差。 Synoptic Reporting可以改善文档。 目标是识别和评估比较概要和叙事手术报告的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号