...
首页> 外文期刊>Urban Forestry & Urban Greening >The impact of the plains afforestation program and alternative land use scenarios on ecosystem services in an urbanizing watershed
【24h】

The impact of the plains afforestation program and alternative land use scenarios on ecosystem services in an urbanizing watershed

机译:平原造林计划和替代土地利用方案对城市化流域生态系统服务的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ecological restoration programs, which mainly affect land use distribution, may eventually alter the supply of ecosystem services (ESs). Although some positive results have been achieved, the sustainability and long-term effects of ecological restoration program on ecosystem service still remain uncertain. To compare the ES outcomes of ecological restoration programs, the design of alternative land use scenarios is critical for ecological management. This paper presents a case study aiming to explore how the implementation of the Plains Afforestation Program (PAP) and alternative land use scenarios affect the provision of a set of ecosystem services in an urbanizing watershed. We selected 7 ESs, including three water-related services and four ecosystem services (food production (FP), carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), and air pollution removal(APR)). And the comprehensive ecosystem service (CES) index was adopted to reflect the total provision of multiple ESs. The trade-offs among various ESs through correlation analysis were further conducted. Finally, four alternative scenarios were designed to provide insights into the future design and implementation of ecological restoration programs. The results indicated that the PAP implementation enhanced regulating services (SC, WP, CS, and APR) and supporting services (HQ) and reduced provisioning services (WY and FP). Converting cropland to forestland could not simultaneously lead to an enhancement in all ecosystem services. Our results also showed synergies between supporting (HQ) and regulating services (CS, WP, and APR). It is worth noting that soil conservation showed trade-offs between supporting (HQ) and regulating services (CS, WP). The region with a large proportion of woodland improved habitat quality, water purification and carbon storage, but it failed to enhance soil conservation effectively because of its steeper slopes. After the implementation of PAP, no transition occurred in the relationships among the ecosystem services, whereas the trade-offs between water yield and other supporting services and regulating services have been weakened. After the land use scenarios were analyzed, the RB-400 scenario with the highest CES value of all the scenarios can be considered the optimal option because it showed the largest increase in water purification (34%) and habitat quality (3%). Moreover, water purification and habitat quality account for greater proportions of weight in our research area. This scenario provided policy implications for the land-use planning.
机译:主要影响土地利用分配的生态恢复计划最终可能会改变生态系统服务(ESS)的供应。虽然已经实现了一些积极的结果,但生态恢复计划对生态系统服务的可持续性和长期影响仍然不确定。为了比较生态恢复计划的ES结果,替代土地使用方案的设计对于生态管理至关重要。本文提出了一个案例研究,旨在探讨平原造林计划(PAP)和替代土地使用情况的实施方式如何在城市化流域提供一系列生态系统服务。我们选择了7个ESS,包括三种与水有关的服务和四种生态系统服务(食品生产(FP),碳储存(CS),栖息地质量(总部)和空气污染去除(APR))。并采用全面的生态系统服务(CES)指数来反映多个ESS的总提供。进一步进行了通过相关分析的各种ESS之间的权衡。最后,旨在为未来的设计和实施生态恢复程序提供见解。结果表明,PAP实施增强了调节服务(SC,WP,CS和APR)和支持服务(HQ)和减少供应服务(WY和FP)。将农田转变为林地无法同时导致所有生态系统服务的增强。我们的结果还显示了支持(总部)和规范服务(CS,WP和APR)之间的协同作用。值得注意的是,土壤保护在支持(总部)和调节服务(CS,WP)之间表现出折衷。林地比例大部分地区改善了栖息地质量,水净化和碳储存,但由于其陡峭的斜坡,它未能有效地增强土壤保护。在实施PAP后,生态系统服务之间的关系中没有发生过渡,而水产产量与其他配套服务和调节服务之间的权衡则被削弱。在分析土地使用场景之后,所有方案的CES值最高的RB-400场景可以被视为最佳选择,因为它显示出水净化的最大增加(34%)和栖息地质量(3%)。此外,水净化和栖息地质量占我们研究领域的更大比例。此方案提供了对土地使用计划的政策影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号