首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasonics >Efficacy of diclofenac & thiocolchioside gel phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on acute low back pain; a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical study
【24h】

Efficacy of diclofenac & thiocolchioside gel phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on acute low back pain; a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical study

机译:双氯芬酸的疗效和; 硫核苷酸凝胶镇痛营养学与超声治疗对急性低腰疼痛的比较; 预期,双盲,随机临床研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PurposeTo investigate the effect of Phonophoresis (PP) with the combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID’s) and myorelaxant versus routine Ultrasound (US) treatment with non-therapeutic gel on the patients with acute low back pain (ABP).MethodsSixty patients with ABP were randomly assigned into 2 groups. In Group 1 (n?=?30) US was applied using diclofenac?+?Thiocolchicoside gel for 10?min and for a total of 10 sessions. In Group 2 (n?=?30) the same US protocol was applied with the same setting and timing with Group 1 using US gel that does not contain any pharmaceutical ingredient. Evaluation parameters were Visual numeric scale (VNS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Shober test.ResultsComparison of the results obtained from the two groups before treatment and at second (W2) and sixth weeks (W6) posttreatment showed significant improvement in all parameters in both groups (p?
机译:purposeto调查致癌(pp)与非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和莫罗西克人的组合对急性凝胶对急性低腰(ABP)的非治疗凝胶的组合的影响.Methodssixty患者ABP随机分配成2组。在第1组(N?= 30)中,使用二氯芬太克α+?硫脲凝胶10≤min,总共10次。在第2组(n?=Δ30)中,使用不含任何药物成分的美国凝胶,使用与组1相同的凝固和定时施用相同的美国方案。评估参数是视觉数字刻度(VNS),OSWESTRY残疾指数(ODI),以及SHOBER TEST.ResultsCOMPRISH从治疗前两组获得的结果,并在第二个(W2)和第六周(W6)后的结果表现出显着改善两组参数(P?<?0.05)。对于ODI,该组的比较显示了第1组的显着优异的改善,而W2的其他参数没有差异。在W6,除了在Group1中的令人愉快的令人难步的试验外,所有参数(P?<0.05)显着提高了显着的改善。结果表明,PP治疗比ABP患者短期内的常规US治疗优于常规治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号