首页> 外文期刊>Psychotherapy and psychosomatics >Lifestyle Interventions for Weight Management in People with Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis Exploring the Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects
【24h】

Lifestyle Interventions for Weight Management in People with Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis Exploring the Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects

机译:具有严重精神疾病的人类体重管理的生活方式干预:通过荟萃分析,试验顺序分析和荟萃回归分析进行系统审查,探索介质和治疗效果的主持人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Serious mental illness (SMI) reduces life expectancy, primarily due to somatic comorbidity linked to obesity. Meta-analyses have found beneficial effects of lifestyle interventions in people with SMI and recommended their implementation to manage obesity. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the benefits and harms of individualized lifestyle interventions for weight in people diagnosed with SMI and to explore potential mediators and moderators of the effect. Methods: The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42016049093). Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of individualized lifestyle interventions on weight management in people with SMI were included. Primary outcomes were differences in endpoint body mass index (BMI) and the proportion achieving clinically relevant weight loss (>= 5%). Secondary outcomes included quality of life, cardiometabolic risk factors, and adverse effects. Results: We included 41 RCTs (n = 4,267). All trials were at high risk of bias according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The experimental interventions reduced the mean difference in BMI by -0.63 kg/m(2) (95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.02 to -0.23; p = 0.002; I-2 = 70.7%) compared to the control groups. At postintervention follow-up (17 RCTs), the effect size remained similar but was no longer significant (BMI = -0.63 kg/m(2); 95% CI = -1.30 to 0.04; p = 0.07; I-2 = 48.8%). The risk ratio for losing >= 5% of baseline weight was 1.51 (95% CI = 1.07-2.13; p = 0.02) compared to the control groups. GRADE showed very low or low quality of evidence. Conclusion: There is a statistically significant, but clinically insignificant, mean effect of individualized lifestyle interventions for weight reduction in people with SMI.
机译:背景:严重的精神疾病(SMI)降低了预期寿命,主要是由于与肥胖有关的体细胞合作率。 Meta-Analyses发现生活方式干预在SMI人们中的有益效果,并建议他们实施以管理肥胖。目的:这种系统审查的目的是评估个性化生活方式干预的益处和危害对诊断患有SMI的人的体重,并探索潜在的调解员和主持人的效果。方法:该协议在Prospero(CRD42016049093)注册。评估个性化的临床试验(RCTS)包括评估个性化的生活方式干预对SMI人们体重管理的效果。初级结果是端点体重指数(BMI)的差异,并且达到临床相关体重减轻的比例(> = 5%)。二次结果包括生命质量,心脏素质危险因素和不利影响。结果:我们包括41个RCT(n = 4,267)。根据Cochrane手册,所有试验均具有高偏见的风险,以获得干预措施的系统审查。与对照组相比,实验干预率降低了-0.63kg / m(2)(95%置信区间[Ci] = -1.02至-0.23; p = 0.002; I-2 = 70.7%)。在后续后续(17个RCT),效果大小保持相似但不再有显着(BMI = -0.63 kg / m(2); 95%Ci = -1.30至0.04; P = 0.07; I-2 = 48.8 %)。与对照组相比,损失的风险率> = 5%的基线重量为1.51(95%CI = 1.07-2.13; p = 0.02)。等级显示出非常低或低的证据。结论:统计学上显着,但临床上微不足道,平均效果对SMI人的体重减轻的个性化生活方式干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号