...
首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology >Diagnostic accuracy of saline contrast sonohysterography in detecting endometrial polyps in women with postmenopausal bleeding: systematic review and meta‐analysis
【24h】

Diagnostic accuracy of saline contrast sonohysterography in detecting endometrial polyps in women with postmenopausal bleeding: systematic review and meta‐analysis

机译:盐水对比子台阶诊断精度检测患有绝经后缺血性妇女子宫内膜息肉的探测:系统综述与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ABSTRACT Objective In women with postmenopausal bleeding, endometrial polyps are a frequent finding and the risk of a focal (pre)malignancy in a polyp is up to 6%. Because of this reported risk, the detection of polyps in these women, preferably by a minimally invasive method, is important. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the accuracy of saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) for diagnosis of endometrial polyps in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Methods In August 2018, an electronic search was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases to identify all diagnostic studies in which SCSH was used to detect endometrial polyps in postmenopausal women. Studies were included if SCSH was performed to detect endometrial polyps in women with postmenopausal bleeding and if detection of a polyp on hysteroscopy or diagnosis on histopathology was used as a reference standard. Two reviewers assessed methodological quality using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS‐2) tool. Two separate analyses were performed for each reference standard. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the hierarchical summary receiver–operating characteristics (HSROC) model and HSROC curves were plotted. Results After selection and quality assessment, five studies were included. Using ‘polyps diagnosed with histopathology’ as the reference standard, the pooled sensitivity of SCSH was 86.5% (95% CI, 63.6–100%) and the pooled specificity was 91.1% (95% CI, 63.2–100%). Using ‘polyps seen on hysteroscopy’ as the reference standard, the pooled sensitivity of SCSH was 85.1% (95% CI, 66.9–100%) and the pooled specificity was 84.5% (95% CI, 68.1–100%). Excluding the one study that included women in whom the SCSH examination was reported to be suboptimal, the pooled sensitivity increased to 90.7% (95% CI, 72.8–100%) using hysteroscopy as the reference standard. The sensitivity of hysteroscopy to detect polyps, as reported in two studies, was 81–98%. Conclusions Provided that the SCSH examination is of optimal quality, it can be considered as a method to stratify women with postmenopausal bleeding for further diagnostic workup and treatment with hysteroscopy. In women without suspicion of a polypoid lesion on SCSH, and with a benign endometrial sample, expectant management should be considered. Copyright ? 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
机译:摘要患有绝经后血液的妇女的目的,子宫内膜息肉是常见的发现,息肉(前)恶性肿瘤的风险高达6%。由于这一报道的风险,这些女性中息肉的检测,优选地通过微创方法是重要的。该系统审查的目的是评估盐水对比子多子时间(SCSH)的准确性,用于诊断患有绝经后出血的妇女子宫内膜息肉的诊断。方法2018年8月,进行了电子搜索,用于识别SCSH用于检测绝经后妇女的子宫内膜息肉的所有诊断研究。如果进行SCSH以检测患有绝经后出血的妇女的子宫内膜息肉,并且如果在宫腔镜检查或诊断上检测组织病理学的息肉或组织病理学的诊断中,则使用研究。两位审稿人使用诊断准确性研究(Quadas-2)工具的质量评估评估了方法质量。对每个参考标准进行两种单独的分析。使用分层摘要接收器操作特性(HSROC)模型来计算汇总灵敏度和特异性,并且绘制了HSROC曲线。结果选择和质量评估后,包括五项研究。使用“息肉被诊断为组织病理学”作为参考标准,SCSH的汇集敏感性为86.5%(95%CI,63.6-100%),汇集特异性为91.1%(95%CI,63.2-100%)。使用“在宫腔镜检查中看到的息肉”作为参考标准,SCSH的合并敏感性为85.1%(95%CI,66.9-100%),汇集特异性为84.5%(95%CI,68.1-100%)。除了据报告SCSH检查次优的女性中包含的一项研究,汇总的敏感性使用宫腔镜检查增加至90.7%(95%CI,72.8-100%)作为参考标准。宫腔镜检查检测息肉的敏感性,如两项研究所述,均为81-98%。结论如果SCSH检查是最佳的质量,它可以被认为是分层患有绝经后血液出血的方法,以进行宫腔镜检查的进一步诊断处理和治疗。在没有怀疑SCSH上的息肉外病变的女性中,应考虑预期管理的预期管理。版权? 2019年宇。 John Wiley&amp出版; SONS LTD.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号