首页> 外文期刊>Psycho-Oncology: Journal of the Psychological Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer >Thyroid cancer patients receiving an interdisciplinary team‐based care approach ( ITCA‐ThyCa ITCA‐ThyCa ) appear to display better outcomes: P P rogram evaluation results indicating a need for further integrated care and support
【24h】

Thyroid cancer patients receiving an interdisciplinary team‐based care approach ( ITCA‐ThyCa ITCA‐ThyCa ) appear to display better outcomes: P P rogram evaluation results indicating a need for further integrated care and support

机译:接受跨学科小组护理方法的甲状腺癌患者(ITCA-Thyca Itca-Thyca)似乎显示出更好的结果:P P Rogram评估结果表明需要进一步综合护理和支持

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Thyroid cancer (ThyCa) is generally associated with a favorable prognosis and excellent surgical outcomes. Consequently, its treatment is medically focused and current guidelines recommend interdisciplinary care including access to a nurse for complex cases alone. To date, no studies have evaluated the need for and impact of an Interdisciplinary Team‐based Care Approach (ITCA‐ThyCa) for general thyroid cancer patients, including a dedicated nurse as part of a larger interdisciplinary team, as well as patient‐reported outcomes, as is recommended worldwide in cancer care. Our aim was to evaluate such a program. Methods The ITCA‐ThyCa was evaluated within a quasi‐experimental design using the Centers for Disease Control Framework for Program Evaluation, including process and outcome measures. Patients eligible were adults with a biopsy indicating confirmed or highly suspicious ThyCa (TNM‐Classification?+?Bethesda score of V /VI). The intervention group (IG) received ITCA‐ThyCa and the comparison group (CG), usual care alone. Results In our sample comprised of 200 participants (122 IG; 78 CG), ITCA‐ThyCa patients appeared to show significantly better outcomes than CG patients, namely, higher levels of overall well‐being ( P ?=?.001) and fewer physical ( P ?=?.003) and practical ( P ?=?.003) issues and concerns. More satisfied with their overall care ( P ?=?.028), including care coordination ( P ?=?.049), they reported their health care provider as more approachable ( P ?=?.007), respectful ( P ?=?.005), and trustworthy ( P ?=?.077; trend) and were more likely to recommend their hospital ( P ?=?.02). Ninety‐eight percent of IG patients recommended ITCA‐ThyCa. Conclusion Data from our program illustrates that hospital resources should not be allocated based on medical trajectory alone and challenges the idea that ThyCa is “straightforward.” ThyCa patients seem to experience symptom distress at a level comparable to—or exceeding—that of general oncological patients despite their promising medical outcomes, indicating that better integrated care and support are in order.
机译:摘要背景甲状腺癌(Thyca)通常与良好的预后和优异的手术结果相关。因此,其治疗是医学上专注的,目前的指导方针推荐跨学科护理,包括单独访问复杂病例的护士。迄今为止,任何研究都没有评估跨学科团队的护理方法(ITCA-THYCA)对一般甲状腺癌患者的需求和影响,包括专门的护士,作为更大的跨学科团队的一部分,以及患者报告的结果,正如全世界都在癌症护理。我们的目标是评估这样的计划。方法使用疾病控制框架的中心的方案评估,在准实验设计内评价ITCA-THYCA,包括过程和结果措施。患者有资格的成年人有活检,表明确诊或高度可疑的雷卡(TNM分类?+?贝斯达的v / vi)。干预组(IG)收到ITCA-THYCA和比较组(CG),单独常用。结果在我们的样品中由200名参与者(122 Ig; 78cg)组成,ITCA-Thyca患者似乎显示出比CG患者更好的结果,即更高水平的整体福祉(P?= 001)和更少的物理(p?= 003)和实用(p?= 003)问题和担忧。更满意他们的整体护理(P?= 028),包括护理协调(P?= 049),他们报告了他们的医疗保健提供者更接近(p?= 007),尊重(p?= ?.005)和值得信赖的(p?= 077;趋势),更有可能推荐他们的医院(p?= 02)。百分之九十八个IG患者推荐ITCA-Thyca。结论来自我们的计划的数据说明了不应仅仅根据医学轨迹分配医院资源,并挑战Thyca是“直截了当”的想法。尽管有希望的医疗结果,但尚可患者似乎在相当于或超过的症状遇险与一般肿瘤政治患者相当的水平,表明更好的综合护理和支持是有序的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号